The name's Craig, Daniel Craig

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
Nightshade
Posts: 17020
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Nightshade »

riddla wrote:Holy shit, they ARE remaking Casino Royale but no Tarantino =P
Good. Tarantino's a fucking over-rated hack.
User avatar
seremtan
Posts: 36013
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 8:00 am

Post by seremtan »

Fender wrote:Do you agree with the choice of Daniel Craig as the new James Bond?
Yes. 10%
No. 34%
Daniel Who? 56%
92.5k votes
:olo:

http://www.cnn.com/POLLSERVER/results/2 ... clude.html
fixed
Chupacabra
Posts: 3783
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2001 7:00 am

Post by Chupacabra »

Nightshade wrote:
riddla wrote:Holy shit, they ARE remaking Casino Royale but no Tarantino =P
Good. Tarantino's a fucking over-rated hack.
agreed
User avatar
Transient
Posts: 11357
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2001 8:00 am

Post by Transient »

4days wrote:goldeneye was the best post-connery bond film, assuming it was the one with denise richards's boobs in it.

daniel craig looks the part there, bit short though isn't he?
No, that wasn't the one with Denise in it. But Goldeneye was still the best post-Connery Bond film.
DRuM
Posts: 6841
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2002 8:00 am

Post by DRuM »

He's already being labelled James Bland.

http://www.lbcnews1152.co.uk/Article.as ... s&id=31747



'The new James Bond has already got his first mission - to persuade some of the papers he can be a decent 007.

The Daily Mirror - among others - reckons Daniel Craig could turn out to be James Bland.

The 37-year old Layer Cake star will begin filming the re-make of Casino Royale in January.'
Post Reply