Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 5:10 am
fucking pedo
FINEDave wrote:fucking pedo
*changes pic* :icon33:
Page 2 of 2
Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 5:14 am
*changes pic* :icon33:
Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 5:26 am
fucking fa.. nm
Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 5:30 am
DONT LOOK AT ME IN THAT TONE OF VOICE!!!
Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 5:35 am
Tbh, those pics don't look that sharp. Or maybe it's my eyes at this time of morning. Still pretty good though. But are phone cameras not as good as a dedicated 2 mega pixel camera or are they meant to be the same quality?
Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 5:36 am
For a phone thats astounding mate!!!DRuM wrote:Tbh, those pics don't look that sharp. Or maybe it's my eyes at this time of morning. Still pretty good though. But are phone cameras not as good as a dedicated 2 mega pixel camera or are they meant to be the same quality?
Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 5:40 am
You should see the razrDRuM wrote:Tbh, those pics don't look that sharp. Or maybe it's my eyes at this time of morning. Still pretty good though. But are phone cameras not as good as a dedicated 2 mega pixel camera or are they meant to be the same quality?
Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 5:42 am
Indeed it is. But if it's 2 mega pixel, why isn't it the same sharpness of a 2 mega pixel non phone camera?Don Carlos wrote:For a phone thats astounding mate!!!DRuM wrote:Tbh, those pics don't look that sharp. Or maybe it's my eyes at this time of morning. Still pretty good though. But are phone cameras not as good as a dedicated 2 mega pixel camera or are they meant to be the same quality?
Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 5:43 am
size of phone to size of cameraDRuM wrote:Indeed it is. But if it's 2 mega pixel, why isn't it the same sharpness of a 2 mega pixel non phone camera?Don Carlos wrote:For a phone thats astounding mate!!!DRuM wrote:Tbh, those pics don't look that sharp. Or maybe it's my eyes at this time of morning. Still pretty good though. But are phone cameras not as good as a dedicated 2 mega pixel camera or are they meant to be the same quality?
think of the lense difference
think of just holding the phone in your hand not on a stand etc
Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 5:44 am
Yeah, I'm not gonna go for the razer anymore because of that. I'm gonna wait for the LG, or the razer that wizard mentioned.Dave wrote:You should see the razrDRuM wrote:Tbh, those pics don't look that sharp. Or maybe it's my eyes at this time of morning. Still pretty good though. But are phone cameras not as good as a dedicated 2 mega pixel camera or are they meant to be the same quality?
Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 5:46 am
Don Carlos wrote:
Thats the phone
[lvlshot]http://www.inside-handy.de/img/handies/gallery/gal2671fs.jpg[/lvlshot]
A pic taken with it!!!
*edited because of DAVE*
thats a pretty nice mobile phone picture by the way.... although they still havent got the auto focus thing absolutely perfect, but I dtake that over my shitty
sony ericsson t610 (bout 2 years old and luvin it)
Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 5:47 am
by the way, no, you cant click the picture to make it bigger..... thats it. 
Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 5:48 am
Yeah true. I guess the lens would have the most significant effect on the sharpness.Don Carlos wrote:size of phone to size of cameraDRuM wrote:Indeed it is. But if it's 2 mega pixel, why isn't it the same sharpness of a 2 mega pixel non phone camera?Don Carlos wrote: For a phone thats astounding mate!!!
think of the lense difference
think of just holding the phone in your hand not on a stand etc
Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 5:53 am
jesus, this is all i'm using, she works good too!
Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 5:58 am
that is one of the most horrible phones I have ever seenAmIdYfReAk wrote:jesus, this is all i'm using, she works good too!
American Mobiles suck conkey dock
Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 11:55 am
face breaker.Dave wrote:True, because it's not flimsy
Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 11:57 am
yer, the t610 takes terrible pictures, but everything else about it is STILL ace.[FTF]Pyro wrote:Don Carlos wrote:
Thats the phone
[lvlshot]http://www.inside-handy.de/img/handies/gallery/gal2671fs.jpg[/lvlshot]
A pic taken with it!!!
*edited because of DAVE
thats a pretty nice mobile phone picture by the way.... although they still havent got the auto focus thing absolutely perfect, but I dtake that over my shitty
sony ericsson t610 (bout 2 years old and luvin it)
Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 12:07 pm
I had to have a new phone. got rid of my SPV C500 and got a SPV M1500 for work.
Now I can pick my emails up on the road
But it does have a fully working version of Tomb Raider installed and Tom Tom 5.1
Now I can pick my emails up on the road
But it does have a fully working version of Tomb Raider installed and Tom Tom 5.1
Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 12:17 pm
Get a phone that lets you talk to people.
OMG SHOCK HORROR
OMG SHOCK HORROR
Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 12:27 pm
we have a winner.dzjepp wrote:Get a phone that lets you talk to people.
OMG SHOCK HORROR
Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 12:46 pm
This is my phone, I like it because it makes me feel like a cool 1980's African war-lord. Now all I need is an AK-47. :icon31:
Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 1:44 pm
Dont forget jpeg compression and lighting.Don Carlos wrote:size of phone to size of cameraDRuM wrote:Indeed it is. But if it's 2 mega pixel, why isn't it the same sharpness of a 2 mega pixel non phone camera?Don Carlos wrote: For a phone thats astounding mate!!!
think of the lense difference
think of just holding the phone in your hand not on a stand etc
Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 5:15 pm
I like your bearddzjepp wrote:
This is my phone, I like it because it makes me feel like a cool 1980's African war-lord. Now all I need is an AK-47. :icon31: