Mobile phones

Post by **Dave** » Fri Oct 07, 2005 5:10 am

fucking pedo

Post by **Don Carlos** » Fri Oct 07, 2005 5:14 am

Dave wrote:fucking pedo

FINE

*changes pic* :icon33:

Post by **Dave** » Fri Oct 07, 2005 5:26 am

fucking fa.. nm

Post by **Don Carlos** » Fri Oct 07, 2005 5:30 am

DONT LOOK AT ME IN THAT TONE OF VOICE!!!

Post by **DRuM** » Fri Oct 07, 2005 5:35 am

Tbh, those pics don't look that sharp. Or maybe it's my eyes at this time of morning. Still pretty good though. But are phone cameras not as good as a dedicated 2 mega pixel camera or are they meant to be the same quality?

Post by **Don Carlos** » Fri Oct 07, 2005 5:36 am

DRuM wrote:Tbh, those pics don't look that sharp. Or maybe it's my eyes at this time of morning. Still pretty good though. But are phone cameras not as good as a dedicated 2 mega pixel camera or are they meant to be the same quality?

For a phone thats astounding mate!!!

Post by **Dave** » Fri Oct 07, 2005 5:40 am

DRuM wrote:Tbh, those pics don't look that sharp. Or maybe it's my eyes at this time of morning. Still pretty good though. But are phone cameras not as good as a dedicated 2 mega pixel camera or are they meant to be the same quality?

You should see the razr

Post by **DRuM** » Fri Oct 07, 2005 5:42 am

Don Carlos wrote:
DRuM wrote:Tbh, those pics don't look that sharp. Or maybe it's my eyes at this time of morning. Still pretty good though. But are phone cameras not as good as a dedicated 2 mega pixel camera or are they meant to be the same quality?
For a phone thats astounding mate!!!

Indeed it is. But if it's 2 mega pixel, why isn't it the same sharpness of a 2 mega pixel non phone camera?

Post by **Don Carlos** » Fri Oct 07, 2005 5:43 am

DRuM wrote:
Don Carlos wrote:
DRuM wrote:Tbh, those pics don't look that sharp. Or maybe it's my eyes at this time of morning. Still pretty good though. But are phone cameras not as good as a dedicated 2 mega pixel camera or are they meant to be the same quality?
For a phone thats astounding mate!!!
Indeed it is. But if it's 2 mega pixel, why isn't it the same sharpness of a 2 mega pixel non phone camera?

size of phone to size of camera
think of the lense difference
think of just holding the phone in your hand not on a stand etc

Post by **DRuM** » Fri Oct 07, 2005 5:44 am

Dave wrote:
DRuM wrote:Tbh, those pics don't look that sharp. Or maybe it's my eyes at this time of morning. Still pretty good though. But are phone cameras not as good as a dedicated 2 mega pixel camera or are they meant to be the same quality?
You should see the razr

Yeah, I'm not gonna go for the razer anymore because of that. I'm gonna wait for the LG, or the razer that wizard mentioned.

Post by **[FTF]Pyro** » Fri Oct 07, 2005 5:46 am

Don Carlos wrote:

Thats the phone

[lvlshot]http://www.inside-handy.de/img/handies/gallery/gal2671fs.jpg[/lvlshot]

A pic taken with it!!!

*edited because of DAVE *

thats a pretty nice mobile phone picture by the way.... although they still havent got the auto focus thing absolutely perfect, but I dtake that over my shitty

sony ericsson t610 (bout 2 years old and luvin it)

Post by **[FTF]Pyro** » Fri Oct 07, 2005 5:47 am

by the way, no, you cant click the picture to make it bigger..... thats it.

Post by **DRuM** » Fri Oct 07, 2005 5:48 am

Don Carlos wrote:
DRuM wrote:
Don Carlos wrote: For a phone thats astounding mate!!!
Indeed it is. But if it's 2 mega pixel, why isn't it the same sharpness of a 2 mega pixel non phone camera?
size of phone to size of camera
think of the lense difference
think of just holding the phone in your hand not on a stand etc

Yeah true. I guess the lens would have the most significant effect on the sharpness.

Post by **AmIdYfReAk** » Fri Oct 07, 2005 5:53 am

jesus, this is all i'm using, she works good too!

Post by **[FTF]Pyro** » Fri Oct 07, 2005 5:58 am

AmIdYfReAk wrote:jesus, this is all i'm using, she works good too!

that is one of the most horrible phones I have ever seen

American Mobiles suck conkey dock

Post by **+JuggerNaut+** » Fri Oct 07, 2005 11:55 am

Dave wrote:True, because it's not flimsy

face breaker.

Post by **+JuggerNaut+** » Fri Oct 07, 2005 11:57 am

[FTF]Pyro wrote:
Don Carlos wrote:

Thats the phone

[lvlshot]http://www.inside-handy.de/img/handies/gallery/gal2671fs.jpg[/lvlshot]

A pic taken with it!!!

*edited because of DAVE *

thats a pretty nice mobile phone picture by the way.... although they still havent got the auto focus thing absolutely perfect, but I dtake that over my shitty

sony ericsson t610 (bout 2 years old and luvin it)

yer, the t610 takes terrible pictures, but everything else about it is STILL ace.

Post by **Doombrain** » Fri Oct 07, 2005 12:07 pm

I had to have a new phone. got rid of my SPV C500 and got a SPV M1500 for work.

Now I can pick my emails up on the road

But it does have a fully working version of Tomb Raider installed and Tom Tom 5.1

Post by **dzjepp** » Fri Oct 07, 2005 12:17 pm

Get a phone that lets you talk to people.

OMG SHOCK HORROR

Post by **Doombrain** » Fri Oct 07, 2005 12:27 pm

dzjepp wrote:Get a phone that lets you talk to people.

OMG SHOCK HORROR

we have a winner.

Post by **dzjepp** » Fri Oct 07, 2005 12:46 pm

This is my phone, I like it because it makes me feel like a cool 1980's African war-lord. Now all I need is an AK-47. :icon31:

Post by **bitWISE** » Fri Oct 07, 2005 1:44 pm

Don Carlos wrote:
DRuM wrote:
Don Carlos wrote: For a phone thats astounding mate!!!
Indeed it is. But if it's 2 mega pixel, why isn't it the same sharpness of a 2 mega pixel non phone camera?
size of phone to size of camera
think of the lense difference
think of just holding the phone in your hand not on a stand etc

Dont forget jpeg compression and lighting.

Post by **DRuM** » Fri Oct 07, 2005 5:15 pm

dzjepp wrote:

This is my phone, I like it because it makes me feel like a cool 1980's African war-lord. Now all I need is an AK-47. :icon31:

I like your beard