Page 10 of 16
Re: mars landing
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 12:52 am
by Tsakali
I'm very hopeful for Europa. From what we know it seems to have a lot of potential. IMO landing a machine there with capable tools will be as exciting as the moon landing, and in a way far far more interesting.
Looks like it will cost them about 2.7 billion to pull that off. Seems to me a bit of a low end quote considering this mars rover cost about 2.2 bil. But either way, it's not extraordinarily out of scope like the estimated half trillion manned mission to mars, so here's hoping it will happen soon! like 8 - 12 years soon.
Re: mars landing
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 1:33 am
by 0psys
GONNAFISTYA wrote:0psys wrote:He doesn't think Europa has any life though. "probably not" was a direct quote.
He's probably right, but I'll keep hoping. I guess the only thing that does keep the hope alive is that every six months or so scientists keep finding life here on Earth where they don't expect to find it.
I think I like the idea of something being on Europa more than I do Mars. If it's on Mars, it's definitely just going to be microbial; on Europa it could be giant space sharks or shit like that.
Re: mars landing
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 2:09 am
by GONNAFISTYA
Or three-titted mermaids.
Re: mars landing
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 2:23 am
by obsidian
mrd wrote:at least try some delicious Europa water

It's water that at no point of time came out of the penis/vagee of a T-rex. Bottle that shit up, market it with Hollywood tie-ins and sell it. We can label it EAUropa with a picture on the bottle of a 3-titted mermaid. $$$$!
Re: mars landing
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 2:27 am
by mrd
obsidian wrote:mrd wrote:at least try some delicious Europa water

It's water that at no point of time came out of the penis/vagee of a T-rex. Bottle that shit up, market it with Hollywood tie-ins and sell it. We can label it EAUropa with a picture on the bottle of a 3-titted mermaid. $$$$!
As long as the fish-half is the top half, I'm sold.
Re: mars landing
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 2:43 am
by GONNAFISTYA
obsidian wrote:It's water that at no point of time came out of the penis/vagee of a T-rex.
ffs
Now you had to go and remind me that the water I'm drinking probably contains atoms that were sprayed out the ass of a rhino's ancestor. Fuck you.
Re: mars landing
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 2:45 am
by obsidian
So what you're saying is, you'd buy a bottle of refreshingly pure EAUropa?
Re: mars landing
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 2:49 am
by GONNAFISTYA
I'll take ten.
Re: mars landing
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 3:42 am
by Tsakali
Re: mars landing
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 7:17 am
by Eraser
seremtan wrote:Insensatez wrote:
Wherever there are humans, stupidity is guaranteed!
you two need to either go on a killing spree to cull the herd, kill yourselves, or shut the fuck up already
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=47967
Re: mars landing
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 3:51 pm
by xer0s
FYI, Curiosity is on the move...
Re: mars landing
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 4:33 pm
by GONNAFISTYA
The thing I find so surprising in all this is that there are no bleeding-heart Liberals lamenting the unprovoked invasion of another planet and there are no hate-anyone-but-you Conservatives who are bitching about Curiosity's illegal immigrant status on Mars.
Re: mars landing
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 4:44 pm
by bitWISE
Illegal immigrant? Sheeeeeeit, that there is US soil with exclusive mining rights reserved for Halliburton.
Re: mars landing
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 4:49 pm
by seremtan
not if ESA astronauts get there first - which, with the way NASA's budget is getting slashed, is looking increasingly likely
Re: mars landing
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 5:07 pm
by Eraser
Nah, the Chinese will conquer mars
Re: mars landing
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 5:12 pm
by MKJ
Mars One project seems most likely atm.
Re: mars landing
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 5:46 pm
by Insensatez
MKJ wrote:
and arrogance. when GKY talked about potential life on Europa, he didn't mean life for us humans.
and yet, here we are with a rover on mars, we haven't had data from from the soil the spectrometer still needs to analyse, let alone found something organic overthere, and yet you're here talking about a moon that's almost 4 times farther away from Earth.
Re: mars landing
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 6:23 pm
by GONNAFISTYA
Insensatez has no idea how to follow a conversation and has no idea that not all life forms need to get their energy from the sun. It doesn't matter how far it is from the Earth you idiot.
Re: mars landing
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 6:35 pm
by Captain
MKJ wrote:Mars One project seems most likely atm.
Then it's only a matter of time before Hell invades us.
Re: mars landing
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 7:19 pm
by Doombrain
GONNAFISTYA wrote:Insensatez has no idea how to follow a conversation and has no idea that not all life forms need to get their energy from the sun. It doesn't matter how far it is from the Earth you idiot.
Wellllll Europa only has a chance at 'complex' life when the sun goes nova, and only then for the blip in time it has before the sun cools. Basic single cell life, yes fair enough.
Anything under two cells gets hit by the below rule.

Re: mars landing
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 7:47 pm
by GONNAFISTYA
We aren't talking about "complex life"...just life. And as was pointed out several times, nobody is talking about whether or not it suits human life, which is what your chart of the Goldilocks Zone indicates.
Re: mars landing
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 7:57 pm
by Doombrain
k then
Re: mars landing
Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 7:45 am
by Whiskey 7
Someone mumbled/mentioned somewhere about photos of UFOs taken by the Curiosity rover.
Anyone hear of same?
Re: mars landing
Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 8:29 am
by Eraser
Haven't they (JPL) already said that it was dust on the lens?
Re: mars landing
Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 9:48 am
by Insensatez
GONNAFISTYA wrote:Insensatez has no idea how to follow a conversation and has no idea that not all life forms need to get their energy from the sun. It doesn't matter how far it is from the Earth you idiot.
I wasn't talking about the sun, and all life in the universe being dependant on it (or any star for that matter), I was talking about having actual evidence, not plausibility.
Same goes for saying it's plausible there's a teapot in orbit around the sun somewhere.