Page 10 of 10
Re: the galaxy s3?
Posted: Sat Aug 04, 2012 3:34 am
by Scourge
GONNAFISTYA wrote:
Hopefully by then Randy will have calmed the fuck down.
Highly doubtful.
Re: the galaxy s3?
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 9:10 am
by MKJ
so, due to a stroke of total coincidence I now own a S3. I'm no phone buff at all, I hardly care for them. that said;
its spiffy enough, responsive touchscreen (more so than the iphone, and leaps over the s2 or htc sensation).
I kinda get what geoff is saying about the pixels, iphones tend to have this all-encompassing anti-aliasing going on. which IMO is great for animations and such, but kinda sucks for static elemtens like UI or text. the S3 with its AMOLED screen doesnt have that. its better than the S2 which is indeed a bit pixelly.
Compared to the iphone4S, the screen is a bit sharper. not pixellated mind, just sharper. I prefer it over the over-antialiassed (and sometimes blurry) iphone screens

Re: the galaxy s3?
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 10:47 am
by Captain
I don't notice any pixelation in my S2 screen, but congratulations on buying a real phone and not an overpriced toy for cultists

Re: the galaxy s3?
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 2:12 pm
by scared?
I'm always right...
Re: the galaxy s3?
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 3:54 pm
by LawL
scared? wrote:I'm forever poor...
Re: the galaxy s3?
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 5:24 pm
by scared?
Lol u failed that time lawl...lol dumb ppl...
Re: the galaxy s3?
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 9:50 pm
by LawL
lol no, I always win. Got it? Good.
Re: the galaxy s3?
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 4:49 pm
by shaft
Galaxy S3 is among a growing list of Samsung models susceptible to remote wipe attack
"
Slashgear tells us, the process can be enabled in multiple ways, including NFC, QR code, or pushed from a Web site. "
http://www.cnet.com/8301-17918_1-575196 ... wipe-hack/
Re: the galaxy s3?
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 4:59 pm
by scared?
Lol it's a unsecured pixelated piece of shit...
Re: the galaxy s3?
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 6:02 pm
by obsidian
Re: the galaxy s3?
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 6:35 pm
by bitWISE
Wow that site looks bad
Re: the galaxy s3?
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 6:35 pm
by GONNAFISTYA
lol jesus it reads like an Apple advert
Re: the galaxy s3?
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 7:43 pm
by plained
^ it really does ey
sickening
what kind of blind wagon jumper would not see it that way?
oh yea, apple dildos do

Re: the galaxy s3?
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 8:23 pm
by Captain
"Apple dildos" LOL
Re: the galaxy s3?
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 9:31 pm
by Big Kahuna Burger
<frame src="tel:*2767*3855%23">
*2767*3855%23
^reset any galaxy 3. I'm sure it will get fixed with a software update from your carrier... oh wait

Re: the galaxy s3?
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 10:15 pm
by U4EA
It should be noted that this is a TouchWiz [Samsung UI layer] vulnerability, and serves as yet another example as to why the mountains of handset manufacturer and carrier garbage are such a bad idea.
Re: the galaxy s3?
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:42 pm
by Silicone_Milk
"Display Resolution: 1280 x 720 pixels"
That's more than the resolution of my clunky CRT monitor (1024 x 768 which I thought was 'high resolution' back then). They squeezed that shit into a phone screen? Crazy.
Re: the galaxy s3?
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2012 2:01 am
by shaft
Big Kahuna Burger wrote:<frame src="tel:*2767*3855%23">
*2767*3855%23
^reset any galaxy 3. I'm sure it will get fixed with a software update from your carrier... oh wait


Re: the galaxy s3?
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2012 4:02 am
by scared?
lol what kind of moron owns a droid?...
Re: the galaxy s3?
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2012 4:10 am
by GONNAFISTYA
Re: the galaxy s3?
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2012 4:18 am
by shaft
Re: the galaxy s3?
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2012 10:51 am
by xer0s
lol