Things that need to be done...

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
saturn
Posts: 4334
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2000 8:00 am
Location: The Netherlands

Post by saturn »

Turbanator wrote:
saturn wrote:I just noticed that the lettertype of topics is in bold, it looks a bit cluttered IMO. What if this is changed? :)
I was thinking about this last night, should we put the topic titles back to unbold (as in ubb q3w)... and what about underlines... underlines look cluttered imho....
no bold and underlines :)
Underpants?
Posts: 4755
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2001 7:00 am

Post by Underpants? »

U4EA wrote:Wasted space innit? We could be using 96% or 98% instead and still have a decent amount of padding.
omfg!lol!rofl!lmao! UR right, U4EALOLRFLOLMAO! that extra 6% is going to waste!!! Fuck me, there are starving children in Mexico (ie. bliusca) who have NO forum whatsoever and like ravenous internet gluttons we're simply tossing unused forum away! your post is neither petty nor does it in any way make you out to be a whining trifling nerd!! :upupupupupupupupupupupupup:
U4EA
Posts: 2894
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2000 8:00 am

Post by U4EA »

kekeke ?
Turbanator
Posts: 883
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 1983 7:00 am

Post by Turbanator »

[lvlshot]http://www.quake3world.com/turb/forum/1.jpg[/lvlshot]
[lvlshot]http://www.quake3world.com/turb/forum/2.jpg[/lvlshot]
Fender
Posts: 5876
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2001 8:00 am

Post by Fender »

I like the font in #2, but no underline.
Ryoki
Posts: 13460
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2001 7:00 am

Post by Ryoki »

Please, for the love of moses sandals, turn on the HTML in posts. :tear:
[size=85][color=#0080BF]io chiamo pinguini![/color][/size]
SplishSplash
Posts: 4467
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2000 8:00 am

Post by SplishSplash »

Underlined looks good.
Bdw3
Posts: 3348
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Bdw3 »

Fender wrote:I like the font in #2, but no underline.
Same. :icon14:
User avatar
MKJ
Posts: 32582
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2000 8:00 am

Post by MKJ »

center is a depricated tag :E

but yea :p
[url=http://profile.mygamercard.net/Emka+Jee][img]http://card.mygamercard.net/sig/Emka+Jee.jpg[/img][/url]
glossy
Posts: 2282
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2002 7:00 am

Post by glossy »

riddla wrote:Here's the list of completely safe HTML tags I have allowed on my phpbb boards:

b,i,u,p,pre,blockquote,br,strong,ul,ol,li,H1,H2,H3,H4,tt
"completely safe" is a bit of a overconfidant place to be.

by the way, i would heavily suggest rewriting the "allowed html" checking code, it's shitty with stock ubb (for example, you can't do <tag attribute="value">, it'll be blocked/disallowed -- only straight <tag> works. this means no <bgsound src="">/<iframe src="">/<img src=""> stuff if you wanted it)
mjrpes
Posts: 4980
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2000 8:00 am

Post by mjrpes »

Fender wrote:I like the font in #2, but no underline.
a.k.a. classic q3w :up:
U4EA
Posts: 2894
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2000 8:00 am

Post by U4EA »

glossy wrote:by the way, i would heavily suggest rewriting the "allowed html" checking code, it's shitty with stock ubb (for example, you can't do <tag attribute="value">, it'll be blocked/disallowed -- only straight <tag> works. this means no <bgsound src="">/<iframe src="">/<img src=""> stuff if you wanted it)
I just did an <img src="" width=blah> right here .. presumably, it's working .. ?!
User avatar
MKJ
Posts: 32582
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2000 8:00 am

Post by MKJ »

assuming yer still working on the css, i wont say anything about the colordifference between a new and visited link being too subtle

that sentence doesnt make any sense but you know what i mean :A
[url=http://profile.mygamercard.net/Emka+Jee][img]http://card.mygamercard.net/sig/Emka+Jee.jpg[/img][/url]
Turbanator
Posts: 883
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 1983 7:00 am

Post by Turbanator »

hows that?
User avatar
MKJ
Posts: 32582
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2000 8:00 am

Post by MKJ »

:icon14: thats what im talking about
booya
[url=http://profile.mygamercard.net/Emka+Jee][img]http://card.mygamercard.net/sig/Emka+Jee.jpg[/img][/url]
SplishSplash
Posts: 4467
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2000 8:00 am

Post by SplishSplash »

Ok, maybe I'm the only one experiencing this, but:

The "New Reply" arrows don't work correctly (at least not all the time).
Links that I've visited appear as unvisited. This is the only site where I have this problem.
Guest

Post by Guest »

There was a thread moved from GD to Fix. I posted in it in Fix and the posts showed up in the same thread in GD.

http://www.quake3world.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=712
Guest

Post by Guest »

Well shit, nm then. Just assumed I was still in GD.
User avatar
Mat Linnett
Posts: 2483
Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2000 7:00 am
Location: The Grizzly Grotto

Post by Mat Linnett »

Don't know if it's been mentioned, but could either the quick reply box or the "Post Topic | Post Reply" buttons be moved away from eachother?
The amount of times I've entered a reply in quickly reply only to press the "Post Reply" button above and lose the post is rather irritating...
SplishSplash
Posts: 4467
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2000 8:00 am

Post by SplishSplash »

SplishSplash wrote:Ok, maybe I'm the only one experiencing this, but:

The "New Reply" arrows don't work correctly (at least not all the time).
Links that I've visited appear as unvisited. This is the only site where I have this problem.
This still stands btw. Deleting the cookies didn't help shit, or at least not permanently.
prince1000
Posts: 1892
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2001 8:00 am

Post by prince1000 »

might want to think about adding a memberlist link again. maybe a link to the avatar gallery as well.
Turbanator
Posts: 883
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 1983 7:00 am

Post by Turbanator »

sorry about all that, upgrading to the latest version.
Massive Quasars
Posts: 8696
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Massive Quasars »

quite annoying
[url=http://www.marxists.org/][img]http://img442.imageshack.us/img442/3050/avatarmy7.gif[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/1736/leninzbp5.gif[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/1076/modulestalinat6.jpg[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/9239/cheds1.jpg[/img][/url]
The HavoX
Posts: 1207
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 4:31 pm

Post by The HavoX »

Turbanator wrote:sorry about all that, upgrading to the latest version.
I was wondering if that was the case when I clicked the phpBB link while Q3W was down
Turbanator
Posts: 883
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 1983 7:00 am

Post by Turbanator »

the forum code is so modified already that the update was a little more than tricky to perform. Seems to have worked though.... *shrug*
Post Reply