Quake3World

Someone try clicking the "WoW questions" thread.

It seems there are two "General Discussion" links at the top right. It's not a problem, just thought it might interest Turbie or whoever's hacking away at these boards.

Edit: Gone now, nevermind.

stop being on crack

I can hear the forums in my dreams.

"If you build it, they will come."

The Yahoo icon does not have a transparent background.

Look 7 posts up.

if someone can be bothered, the msn, icq, aim and Y! icons all need remaking.

<img src="http://web.icq.com/whitepages/online?icq=16398296&img=5"><img src="http://www.quake3world.com/ubb/icq_text.gif">

I just noticed that the lettertype of topics is in bold, it looks a bit cluttered IMO. What if this is changed?

Turbanator wrote:if someone can be bothered, the msn, icq, aim and Y! icons all need remaking.

<img src="http://web.icq.com/whitepages/online?icq=16398296&img=5"><img src="http://www.quake3world.com/ubb/icq_text.gif">

remade how? do they need transparent background only, or do you actually want something remade ?

saturn wrote:I just noticed that the lettertype of topics is in bold, it looks a bit cluttered IMO. What if this is changed?

I was thinking about this last night, should we put the topic titles back to unbold (as in ubb q3w)... and what about underlines... underlines look cluttered imho....

glossy wrote:

Turbanator wrote:if someone can be bothered, the msn, icq, aim and Y! icons all need remaking.

<img src="http://web.icq.com/whitepages/online?icq=16398296&img=5"><img src="http://www.quake3world.com/ubb/icq_text.gif">

remade how? do they need transparent background only, or do you actually want something remade ?

they need the text next to them, and some of them need to be smaller so it all blends together.

Why does q3w insist on using only 90% of the page width?

U4EA wrote:Why does q3w insist on using only 90% of the page width?

because we can?

q3w is a rebel without a cause

rock on!

Wasted space innit? We could be using 96% or 98% instead and still have a decent amount of padding.

Turbanator wrote:

saturn wrote:I just noticed that the lettertype of topics is in bold, it looks a bit cluttered IMO. What if this is changed?

I was thinking about this last night, should we put the topic titles back to unbold (as in ubb q3w)... and what about underlines... underlines look cluttered imho....

no bold and underlines

U4EA wrote:Wasted space innit? We could be using 96% or 98% instead and still have a decent amount of padding.

omfg!lol!rofl!lmao! UR right, U4EALOLRFLOLMAO! that extra 6% is going to waste!!! Fuck me, there are starving children in Mexico (ie. bliusca) who have NO forum whatsoever and like ravenous internet gluttons we're simply tossing unused forum away! your post is neither petty nor does it in any way make you out to be a whining trifling nerd!! :upupupupupupupupupupupupup:

kekeke ?

[lvlshot]http://www.quake3world.com/turb/forum/1.jpg[/lvlshot]
[lvlshot]http://www.quake3world.com/turb/forum/2.jpg[/lvlshot]

I like the font in #2, but no underline.

Please, for the love of moses sandals, turn on the HTML in posts.

Underlined looks good.

Fender wrote:I like the font in #2, but no underline.

Same. :icon14:

center is a depricated tag :E

but yea

riddla wrote:Here's the list of completely safe HTML tags I have allowed on my phpbb boards:

b,i,u,p,pre,blockquote,br,strong,ul,ol,li,H1,H2,H3,H4,tt

"completely safe" is a bit of a overconfidant place to be.

by the way, i would heavily suggest rewriting the "allowed html" checking code, it's shitty with stock ubb (for example, you can't do <tag attribute="value">, it'll be blocked/disallowed -- only straight <tag> works. this means no <bgsound src="">/<iframe src="">/<img src=""> stuff if you wanted it)