Quake3World

the UN declared the muslimban to be illegal and a violation of human rights. are there any consequences to this or is it just a hollow statement?

Lol, when have there ever been any consequences from the terrorist coalitions' human rights abuses and war crimes?

That's a depressing way to describe the UN. Also, ignorant of a lot of facts.

But yeah, in this case i think it should be construed as a 'hey US, the world frowns at this behaviour' sort of thing, to which the Donald is of course totally immune. Might wake up some people to the dangers of his rule and it might become a little more difficult for (for instance) May to properly explain to her populace why Trump should visit the UK, that's about it.

Kinda what I figured, yeah.
It was presented as breaking news on the matter but ultimately it's just another party not agreeing with the policy. k.

This chaos can't last 4 years.

Nah it's going to get much much worse.

*LOL*

Oh wow!

fucking lol

He's now needing to cancel events -

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world ... 56691.html

White House official says the company decided it was not comfortable hosting him with protests planned...

...Donald Trump has been forced to cancel a trip to a Harley-Davidson factory due to planned protests.

Really hoping this doesn't calm down and the protests are non violent.

losCHUNK wrote: Really hoping this doesn't calm down and the protests are non violent.

Not so much to do with the moral high ground, it's just that the more violence and destruction at these events then the more Trump can point at it to re enforce his beliefs to his supporters.

'Look, they're attacking democracy... GET EM boys' n shit.

Thatcher did it :L, Raegon and possibly Nixon in the US ?. I'd like to see him dragged out a hole Saddam style.

well given that some people are already demanding that Cheeto Benito resign from office, they kind of are attacking democracy :/

Regardless of whether he won the election, people have the right to protest and complain about what the government does if they disagree with it. You can't just say, 'he won the election, so everyone just has to shut up and let him do whatever he wants' - that's not democracy.

And this -

http://www.latimes.com/politics/washing ... cid=SigDig

Days until achieving MAJORITY disapproval from @Gallup

Reagan: 727
Bush I: 1336
Clinton: 573
Bush II: 1205
Obama: 936

Trump: 8. days

losCHUNK wrote:Not so much to do with the moral high ground, it's just that the more violence and destruction at these events then the more Trump can point at it to re enforce his beliefs to his supporters.

'Look, they're attacking democracy... GET EM boys' n shit.

Thatcher did it :L, Raegon and possibly Nixon in the US ?. I'd like to see him dragged out a hole Saddam style.

This isn't going to help me in Wolfenstein.

losCHUNK wrote:Regardless of whether he won the election, people have the right to protest and complain about what the government does if they disagree with it. You can't just say, 'he won the election, so everyone just has to shut up and let him do whatever he wants' - that's not democracy.

And this -

http://www.latimes.com/politics/washing ... cid=SigDig

Days until achieving MAJORITY disapproval from @Gallup

Reagan: 727
Bush I: 1336
Clinton: 573
Bush II: 1205
Obama: 936

Trump: 8. days

ffs dude i was talking about people demanding he resign, not people being critical

Well the point of being critical is the hope of changing someones mind for a better alternative, Trump wont do that so he probaly should.

Tis why I posted the ratings

[vid]https://i.imgur.com/sv8JVOC.gifv[/vid]

lol, just came here to post that

Thank God we're now having a US president that isn't at bloodthirsty, trigger-happy and innocents-killing as Obama was and Clinton would no doubt have been, right Memphis, plained and AndyW? Oh WAIT

jesus christ

http://www.msnbc.com/hardball/watch/con ... 8923971969

Bowling Green Massacre? what.

Wrong clip? http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/02 ... ternative/