Page 63 of 284
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 8:08 pm
by Dave
Technically he'll need an 8000 or 9000 since he's doing 120, which will set him back about $2000
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 1:22 pm
by horton
FanaticX wrote:
Ive walked past hardrock in Ueno, so many times..
Its about 45mins from my house.
Where were the car pics taken? There is a classic car museum in Odaiba, I dont recognise the cars you took as being from there though
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 6:32 pm
by l0g1c
Fresh off the scanner. This is shitloads better than the lab as far as dust is concerned. Didn't get a chance to crop it or anything yet.
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 7:37 pm
by FanaticX
horton wrote:
Ive walked past hardrock in Ueno, so many times..
Its about 45mins from my house.
Where were the car pics taken? There is a classic car museum in Odaiba, I dont recognise the cars you took as being from there though
They were from the Honda Collection Hall at Twin Ring Motegi. A friend of mine used to live 30mins from there.
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 8:59 pm
by saturn
l0g1c wrote:Fresh off the scanner. This is shitloads better than the lab as far as dust is concerned. Didn't get a chance to crop it or anything yet.
I like the atmosphere and lighting, kudos.
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 9:03 pm
by mjrpes
l0g1c wrote:Fresh off the scanner.
Whose scanner? Did you buy one??
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 9:49 pm
by l0g1c
mjrpes wrote:l0g1c wrote:Fresh off the scanner.
Whose scanner? Did you buy one??
I got a
CanoScan 8600F
It works well enough for me, since I'm just a hobbyist.
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 9:52 pm
by l0g1c
saturn wrote:l0g1c wrote:Fresh off the scanner. This is shitloads better than the lab as far as dust is concerned. Didn't get a chance to crop it or anything yet.
I like the atmosphere and lighting, kudos.
Thank you, sir! Means a lot to me since one of your photos has been my desktop at work for ages now (the fall one).
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 10:20 pm
by saturn
Cheers, glad that you liked it. Every new photo you post is improving, so keep it coming :-)
Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 10:59 pm
by Doombrain
I might buy a 1D MKII N
Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 11:41 pm
by Dave
After using both, I prefer the 5D for everything except shooting sports... Even the the 5D has a considerable edge in extreme low light. The 1DMIIN is a better camera in every respect except image quality and low light performance.
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 5:40 pm
by FanaticX
Doombrain wrote:I might buy a 1D MKII N
Why? What's wrong with your current one?
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 8:20 pm
by Doombrain
i can't take it out in the rain, i live in the UK. today i had to run across a carpark with the camera under my coat. the 8.5fps is also nice.
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 8:20 pm
by Doombrain
plus i'm a sucker for tech.
ps rain
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:08 pm
by A1yssa
Doombrain wrote:Dave wrote:H
my favourites
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 10:00 pm
by Dave
Doombrain wrote:plus i'm a sucker for tech.
ps rain
Wait for the rumored new 1D with the 5D sensor and 1V half body... If it's true I'm getting rid of both bodies I have now for that one. Apparently some guy wrote an article about it and had to pull it down for some reason... Usually when that happens it's more than just a rumor. Water resistant and full frame without the full price of a 1DS (which he claims will be 22MP)
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 10:01 pm
by Dave
A1yssa wrote:
my favourites
danke.. Maybe one day I'll rescan them with a not-so-crappy scanner.
Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 6:24 am
by Dave
Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 6:34 am
by FragaGeddon
She's HOT!
Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 6:43 am
by l0g1c
Huzzah for weird film anomalies and poorly scanned photos.
Apparently, there's a paramecium eating my film.
Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 6:49 am
by Dave
It looks like either fogged film or light leakage on the scanner bed
Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 6:51 am
by Tsakali_
l0g1c wrote:Fresh off the scanner. This is shitloads better than the lab as far as dust is concerned. Didn't get a chance to crop it or anything yet.
I want a wallpaper size copy of that :icon14:
Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 6:54 am
by Dave
Since it's MF, you could almost wallpaper an entire wall in your house with that
Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 6:59 am
by l0g1c
Tsakali_ wrote:l0g1c wrote:Fresh off the scanner. This is shitloads better than the lab as far as dust is concerned. Didn't get a chance to crop it or anything yet.
I want a wallpaper size copy of that :icon14:
I'll re-scan it in a higher resolution this weekend and post it. :icon14:
Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 7:02 am
by l0g1c
Dave wrote:It looks like either fogged film or light leakage on the scanner bed
It's on the negative like that. At first I thought that I might've exposed it when I was loading the film, since it was the first frame, but the weird thing is that it's on the trailing edge of the picture. I dunno.
I kinda like how it turned out, though. Mistakes = art, right?
