Quake3World

-y jelly

GONNAFISTYA wrote:Yes. And it's the way you, gramps and a few other gun nuts on this board have acted since the first time gun laws have been discussed on this forum. In every case over the last DECADE in the way you, gramps (and sometimes Torm) will - without fail - feel the need to respond to every single comment that disagrees with you about owning a gun for protection. It has never crossed your empty head to budge on this utterly and clearly fucking retarded topic. You WILL NOT LISTEN to anyone who tells you you're totally bonkers about guns.

And then you bitch that I'm not listening...

I'm glad you finally figured out what I've been doing this whole thread.

I like how everyone who doesn't fully agree with you is a gun nut. Is there no variance here? I agree with some aspect of what you're saying. I just don't don't think your assessments are accurate. Maybe you're a gun Nazi.

Something to consider.

No. There will be no variance here. You're again completely missing the point.

You're once again asking for me to bend in some direction on this topic while you find more reasons not to. It simply does not matter how many people try to talk sense to you and your gun-nut cohorts...you will not budge. You can go ahead and say I and others haven't tried to engage you and you know full well that's not true from the hundreds upon hundreds of links, facts and ideas that most non-gun nut yanks have presented here over the years. We've really tried. It is you who "stays the course", regardless of the endless supply of evidence and links showing you why you look like crazy people. And since a dismissive attitude is the default approach that gun-nuts take in these discussions, I simply refuse to let you idiots think this approach is worthwhile.

I thought Eraser's troll of NS and sys0p was pretty damned obvious as to the attitudes that keep getting presented here (and the unwillingness to listen to new facts) but I guess you guys were too stupid to catch that hint as well.

guns

GONNAFISTYA wrote:Yes. And it's the way you, gramps and a few other gun nuts on this board have acted since the first time gun laws have been discussed on this forum. In every case over the last DECADE in the way you, gramps (and sometimes Torm) will - without fail - feel the need to respond to every single comment that disagrees with you about owning a gun for protection. It has never crossed your empty head to budge on this utterly and clearly fucking retarded topic. You WILL NOT LISTEN to anyone who tells you you're totally bonkers about guns.

And then you bitch that I'm not listening...

I'm glad you finally figured out what I've been doing this whole thread.

All you're doing here is A. Proving that you don't actually read anything I post, and B. Showing that you're a closed-minded, hypocritical fool. You constantly project your own bullshit on to everyone that disagrees with you. You state that anyone that disagrees is attacking you, which is what you then promptly do. The less people respond to your antics, or if god forbid, they call you out on your bullshit, the angrier you get. Anyone holding a different opinion is a fucking retard and won't listen to reason. That's not a new tack for you, you've done that since Christ was a corporal, so don't sit there and say "OH THAT'S JUST WHAT I'M DOING NOW TO SHOW YOU HOW STUPID YOU FUCKING RETARDS ARE", because it's total shite. That's your standard M.O.

I feel the need to respond to every opposing viewpoint? For fuck's sake, #1, it's a discussion forum, discussion happen here, and #2, that's exactly what you do. But, somehow it's different when you do it, right?

You're completely and totally full of shit, and you're trying to hide the fact that you've been acting like a total jackass by saying that you're trying to show others the error of their ways by sinking to their level. Hmm, who have I heard say things like that recently? Oh yeah, Rush Limbaugh.

Yes, I "figured out" what you're doing in this thread quite a while ago. Namely, being your usual mentally ill self.

LawL wrote: guns

GONNAFISTYA wrote:
I thought Eraser's troll of NS and sys0p was pretty damned obvious as to the attitudes that keep getting presented here (and the unwillingness to listen to new facts) but I guess you guys were too stupid to catch that hint as well.

As I said earlier (I'll repeat it because you keep proving you don't actually read my posts), Eraser posted a comment that was completely in line with pretty much all of his posts on gun control and his opinion of my views. Yet somehow that's supposed to be a troll?

Let's try this:

Me: I support the Second Amendment.

GFY: OMG YOU'RE SUCH A FUCKING RETARD.

Me: OMG LOL TROLLED.

Sounds pretty fucking dumb, right? Yet you're treating the aforementioned situation like Eraser crafted some masterpiece and I fell for it.

He didn't. He quite simply made the point that the usual knuckle-draggers would show up and type what they've always typed, regardless of what's actually happening in reality.

GONNAFISTYA wrote:No. There will be no variance here. You're again completely missing the point.

You're once again asking for me to bend in some direction on this topic while you find more reasons not to. It simply does not matter how many people try to talk sense to you and your gun-nut cohorts...you will not budge. You can go ahead and say I and others haven't tried to engage you and you know full well that's not true from the hundreds upon hundreds of links, facts and ideas that most non-gun nut yanks have presented here over the years. We've really tried. It is you who "stays the course", regardless of the endless supply of evidence and links showing you why you look like crazy people. And since a dismissive attitude is the default approach that gun-nuts take in these discussions, I simply refuse to let you idiots think this approach is worthwhile.

I thought Eraser's troll of NS and sys0p was pretty damned obvious as to the attitudes that keep getting presented here (and the unwillingness to listen to new facts) but I guess you guys were too stupid to catch that hint as well.

I say that I can see your point to a degree. You say there is no variance. But then immediately continue your rant by claiming I won't budge. I think you're the "gun-nut".

Now you know what it's like to think you're making headway only to see another brick wall. Isn't this fun?

GONNAFISTYA wrote:He didn't. He quite simply made the point that the usual knuckle-draggers would show up and type what they've always typed, regardless of what's actually happening in reality.

You sure did show up, dragging your knuckles deep.

GONNAFISTYA wrote:Now you know what it's like to think you're making headway only to see another brick wall. Isn't this fun?

Kicking sand in the face of a fool who digs himself into a hole and can't get out is quite fun.

Nightshade wrote:

LawL wrote: guns

They're apparently making a sequel. It'll be epic.

This is pretty much how every discussion on guns goes:

GONNAFISTYA wrote:Oh hey...Bob Costas is an unreasonable stupid stupid just like me...

BOB COSTAS: Well, you knew it was coming. In the aftermath of the nearly unfathomable events in Kansas City, that most mindless of sports clichés was heard yet again: something like this really puts it all in perspective. Well, if so, that sort of perspective has a very short shelf-life since we will inevitably hear about the perspective we have supposedly again regained the next time ugly reality intrudes upon our games.

Please, those who need tragedies to continually recalibrate their sense of proportion about sports would seem to have little hope of ever truly achieving perspective. You want some actual perspective on this?

Well, a bit of it comes from the Kansas City-based writer Jason Whitlock with whom I do not always agree, but who today said it so well that we may as well just quote or paraphrase from the end of his article.

“Our current gun culture,” Whitlock wrote, “ensures that more and more domestic disputes will end in the ultimate tragedy, and that more convenience-store confrontations over loud music coming from a car will leave more teenage boys bloodied and dead."

“Handguns do not enhance our safety. They exacerbate our flaws, tempt us to escalate arguments, and bait us into embracing confrontation rather than avoiding it. In the coming days, Jovan Belcher’s actions, and their possible connection to football, will be analyzed. Who knows?"

“But here,” wrote Jason Whitlock, “is what I believe. If Jovan Belcher didn’t possess a gun, he and Kasandra Perkins would both be alive today.”

The Nuge is a bit of a nutter.

GONNAFISTYA wrote:He didn't. He quite simply made the point that the usual knuckle-draggers would show up and type what they've always typed, regardless of what's actually happening in reality.

Really? That's odd and completely different from what you said twice in this thread already. You know, where you said he posted a very obvious troll? Twice? In this thread? Remember that?

I really like the way you totally avoided everything that you couldn't directly refute, too. Nice trick, another one that you use on a regular basis. Yeah, still waiting for you to point out where I "completely lost my shit" in this thread. Can you do that for me, perhaps?

GONNAFISTYA wrote:

Nightshade wrote:

They're apparently making a sequel. It'll be epic.

Hey, guess what? This is another diagnostic behavior of yours. You've been doing nothing but calling me a fucking moron and a retard, telling me that I'm crazy, blind, and that I refuse to listen, and yet here you are quoting my post to LawL, acting like none of that happened.

Seriously dude, you need some intensive psychiatric assistance.

I thought I explained myself to you? Desperate troll is desperate?

I honestly don't feel like going through and organizing quotes to show how angry you are every time this topic comes up, even though I offered it and even though it happens every single time it comes up, hence the thread title. I also don't care to counter-point anything you've asked since most of what you've complained about is a need to see some quotes of your aforementioned anger. It's really not hard to see.

Besides, when are you going to get around to addressing my points about your paranoia, hatred of government and apathic attitude whenever there's violence involved? Or how you think you live in a lawless society and civilization has collapsed? Or that you don't live in Afghanistan? (Seriously...if you lived in Afghanistan I would completely support your need for a gun 100% as any white man in that country would be a target) Or how about the fact that I was answering xer0s when you grabbed a righteous hold on my admittedly shit attitude and henceforth began your shit-fit? Or my point that you, as well as I in this thread, have historically shown a trend of dismissing new ideas and facts on gun violence and how it's really a waste of time with you to change your mind, even slightly? Even gramps admits his hard headedness in that department. And before you think I can't open my mind don't forget that I'm not against owning a gun, just against the idea of being paranoid enough to feel you need one. You really shouldn't bitch that I haven't addressed most of your points when you've done the same. And really...it's not about me having a self-righteous rant or looking superior, it's about me pointing out that your need to own a gun is as irrational as some religious nutter who says the universe is 6000 years old, which I'm sure you'd share my sanctimony in that one, right? Yeah...you would. How many ways do I have to call you a hypocrite?

You think you need a gun. So sad. All that's left to fill out my stereotypical picture of you is for you to be photographed wearing a wife-beater shirt watching a cage match and then the image of an angry white male who's paranoid and violent enough to own and use a gun for protection will be complete. I have no doubt there's a Confederate flag in there somewhere.

Anyways, you either have a vagina with this ridiculous display of hurt feelings or you're fucking retarded. I like to think neither, but you're not giving me much to work with.

And ffs...Eraser's post WAS an obvious troll. He trolled you by predicting that you'd show up all knuckle-dragger like. I think that's exactly what happened too, as my re-reading of the pages indicate you called him "extremely hard of thinking" and that he was "a retard that doesn't actually pay attention to anything you've posted". (paraphrasing) Is any of this familiar to you? We can read it anytime...bottom of page 1. I didn't make that up, either.

Nightshade wrote:

GONNAFISTYA wrote: They're apparently making a sequel. It'll be epic.

Hey, guess what? This is another diagnostic behavior of yours. You've been doing nothing but calling me a fucking moron and a retard, telling me that I'm crazy, blind, and that I refuse to listen, and yet here you are quoting my post to LawL, acting like none of that happened.

Seriously dude, you need some intensive psychiatric assistance.

So you're saying that I can't react to any other posts in this or any other thread that you post in unless I address the absolute stupidity that you've posted? Primal alpha-male on display here. Shouldn't you also be trying to push your forehead into mine to show your dominance? Go sweetly fuck yourself you nutter.

You really are angry.



And paranoid.

lol wow

Plan B wrote:-y jelly

diamond in the rough.

There's so much sexual tension in this thread.

Does that mean you have a stiffy?

GONNAFISTYA wrote:You really are angry.

He's angry? You nearly wrote 600 words in that post alone.

mrd wrote:Does that mean you have a stiffy?

A semi.

Transient wrote:

GONNAFISTYA wrote:You really are angry.

He's angry? You nearly wrote 600 words in that post alone.

ffs dude I've continually tried to make the discussion about unhealthy gun worship and they've continuallly tried to make the thread about me so they don't have to talk about their unhealthy gun worship.