Quake3World

I don't think people are idiots for believing something that helps them get through tough times.

But I do have a big problem with people who insist that, since they have been "saved," they obviously have the best solution for everyone.

In short, I hate any dickhead who practices unsolicited preaching. Beyond that, I couldn't give two shits who the real god is, or what the 'true' meaning to life is. I have my own reasons for wanting a rich and full life, and your reasons aren't any better than mine just because you had some kind of epiphany that someone else talked you into.

Kracus wrote:Sorry chunk, you're just assuming that's what's going on. I'm asking questions these guys simply refuse to awnser. your' talking like I'm trying to ram this down your throat when I'm really trying to get people to logicly reason why they beleive what they do. I have my reasons for beleiving what I beleive. But as soon as I start asking questions too difficult to awnser torm just says I'm a retard. It's the same fucking thing in any thread I post in it's a fucking farce. I get called a retard for asking when really my questions are totaly legitimate, spot on, and carry a lot of weight when you really THINK about it.

Kracus, you really are hopeless. I answered your question on why I believe but you ignored it because it wasn't the answer you wanted to hear. There is nothing about what you've said that is trying to establish a logical conversation and you consistently try to force your beliefs on anyone who disagrees. An example of this is saying that anyone who believes in a higher power is "brainwashed". Right there you have stated your ignorance and unwillingness to see anyone's point of view and reaffirmed that yours is the only belief that could possibly be right.

You get called down in almost every thread you post in because of your meaningless drivel and unwillingness to educate yourself on any subject you discuss. Your "thoughts" only carry weight in your own hazy and stoned mind.

Kracus wrote:Yeah but the difference between a theory and a bible is that one is an idea that you think might be possible but you don't know yet until you've proven it.

Religion cannot be proven or disproven simply because it's bogus to begin with but the bible CAN be proven to be fake or at the very least wrong on many counts. So you're analogy is completely wrong.

A theory is usually a set of hypotheses, suggesting a form of causal connection between sets of variables. A well known example is Darwin's theory of evolution. When knowledge is described as , it's based on a theory, but when knowledge is based on actual data, it's known as empirical.


In other words, there is no difference in your theory of life the universe and everything and the bible. Neither is empirical.


Chunk has it right, you no different from those your critisize. You think you know it all, have no solid proof and refuse to listen to anything other then your own beliefs.

I understand what they mean by "Krackified " another thread now. Your not debating and listening kracus your telling and ignoring. Now that is empirical.

Kracus wrote:lol when I think about it I could see religion being created by a bunch of potheads.

And it all comes full circle lol.


Thnx to those who had reasonable arguments in this thread. I repsect those that oppose me, but that have proof and make me think, it was fun. Till the next thread.

Hannibal wrote:

Dr_Watson wrote:
take a stand either way, show some backbone you lazy, no ambition, little bitch.

Why should one be forced to take a 'stand' on an existence claim that is not open to traditional methods of empirical investigation?

because i like prodding people that say they're agnostic.
it's just a trendy thing people say. I find it really hard to swallow that someone honestly has no idea what they believe.
faith has no shades of grey.
its like yoda said, do or do not; there is no try.

Lol, that's fucking stupid.

Dr_Watson wrote:

Hannibal wrote:

Dr_Watson wrote:
take a stand either way, show some backbone you lazy, no ambition, little bitch.

Why should one be forced to take a 'stand' on an existence claim that is not open to traditional methods of empirical investigation?

because i like prodding people that say they're agnostic.
it's just a trendy thing people say. I find it really hard to swallow that someone honestly has no idea what they believe.
faith has no shades of grey.
its like yoda said, do or do not; there is no try.

Agnostics don't believe in a God because there's no evidence to prove his existence, assuming that God made himself known, and started performing miricles and shit, an agnostic would then accept that there is a God and worship it. An athiest wouldn't, they'de denounce whatever God appeared and claim it was a weather balloon, or static energy or whatever.

It wasn't even a very good troll. Noone is that stupid

take a stand..

you mean take a stab..

I fucking hate religiosity...have a good wank..i mean good night.
Btw...why are so many people start war's 'cause of religiousyit?
I'm just wondering.... :icon23:
Edit: I'm currently drunk , sorry for my brutal messages...

now we know what you do on sunday mornings

R00k wrote:I don't think people are idiots for believing something that helps them get through tough times.

But I do have a big problem with people who insist that, since they have been "saved," they obviously have the best solution for everyone.

In short, I hate any dickhead who practices unsolicited preaching. Beyond that, I couldn't give two shits who the real god is, or what the 'true' meaning to life is. I have my own reasons for wanting a rich and full life, and your reasons aren't any better than mine just because you had some kind of epiphany that someone else talked you into.

lol what about un-solicited political preching?

how bout that preching?

So no one has feedback on the idea that the reason we cant find god, is cause he is all around us, is us and we are him?

We are the atoms to his body. Its like looking around the room for yourself and wondering why you cant see your face.


What ya think?

why do moron refer to god as a 'he'? cuz they are unbelievably retarded?

its a living in the presant thing.

its weird being from the future ey?

Iccy (temp) wrote:Its like looking around the room for yourself and wondering why you cant see your face.

and meditation is the mirror!

lol sorry couldn't resist

Freakaloin wrote:why do moron refer to god as a 'he'? cuz they are unbelievably retarded?

Because its just a word to put something in some sorta context. I dont think he or she has anything to do with it, but its better then saying IT.

[xeno]Julios wrote:

Iccy (temp) wrote:Its like looking around the room for yourself and wondering why you cant see your face.

and meditation is the mirror!

lol sorry couldn't resist

Id say meditation is realizing your in the room.

Iccy (temp) wrote:

Freakaloin wrote:why do moron refer to god as a 'he'? cuz they are unbelievably retarded?

Because its just a word to put something in some sorta context. I dont think he or she has anything to do with it, but its better then saying IT.

no its not...'it' is much better...

To you ..

Which is kinda the point behind this whole thread.

moron alert?

You cannot prove god exists.
You cannot prove god doesn't exist.

Q. Why do we beleive in something no one has ever had any evidence of existance?

A. Man imagined it.

Q. Why does any human beleive in religion
A. Because they were taught about religion by someone else.

Q. Why can't I prove god doesn't exist?
A. Same reason I can't prove many fictional characters don't exist. Prove to me star wars really didn't happen in a galaxy far far away a long long time ago. It's a pointless unawnserable question and only proves that since god has never shown any evidence of existance in this universe that man has created god. Even if god does exist man has done nothing but guess it's existance and it's potential and it's interest in us as human beings. It seems like a very large assumption to me.

its like dogs wondering if there is life on mars...pathetic...