Surprising. You can't think of anything, really? Then you haven't been listening to him during the campaign.Memphis wrote:What news? Heard NYT has been onto him lately, but they're as compromised as CNN and the rest with Clintonite insiders. What's wrong with Putin?
Ah, but most intelligence experts agreed with that assessment. So either they're all in on it or there's some truth to it. I'll choose to believe the latter for now, seeing as there's no evidence to the contrary. I'd also be interested in where you found the 'Russian spy' thing regarding Comey, first time i heard of it.Memphis wrote:It's ever a viable option to blame another country for absolutely everything? She blamed them for Wikileaks, she said Trump himself had Russian backing, she said Comey was a 'Russian spy', lol. Goodman goes over this - Comey had no control over the finding of backed-up e-mails on Weiner's laptop, basically. He let her off literally for being 'too dumb to know', then let her off again, after new evidence was found.
Yes yes, again you point to stuff she said and did before the election. Why not hold Trump to that same standard?Memphis wrote:Climate is depressing yes, but nonetheless true. And she's never been and never will be against fracking, or big-oil in general. We know that for a damn fact, from her speeches.
Agreed on that part - i just happen to think most of those voters were woefully uninformed and didn't (or refused to?) see that the Obama foreign policy was actually better in several ways than the Bush foreign policy. And me taking that position does not mean i cheered when Libya went down.Memphis wrote:I think you'll find Trump gained many a voter that actually does not want any more disasterous foreign policy, being aware of just how disasterous it's been for the past eight years. Whereas Clintonites will refuse to even acknowledge that fact. Or do you think the destruction of Libya was a good thing?