Quake3World

Posted: **Wed May 18, 2016 5:10 pm**

Doombrain wrote:Jesus. I've never claimed to be a grammar master but fucking LOL at you.

And you shouldn't. Which would also be a really good reason to skip being critical of others.

Posted: **Wed May 18, 2016 5:24 pm**

lars63 wrote:Then why don't you take the moderator job if you think you can do better. I really hate to get involved in a no win situation like this one. Here goes anyway. I thought this site was supposed to be OK to be viewed at work, that's what everyone here does so when pics like what everyone is talking about is posted it throws this site into the NSFW category and that's why the pics were pulled. I think the moderators did the right thing. YGP mentioned that no one wanted to take the moderator job and the ones we had were thrust upon us, after reading thru four pages of this post I can understand why no one wanted the job. You should be thanking these people who do this for free instead of tearing them down. You couldn't give me a moderator job here either. With that said I'm going to add one more thing. I love this place but you all know its a mad house here, why no one wants to be moderator, maybe why I like it here,(LOL). Now carry on, lets see where this goes

I wouldn't want the job either. #1 I don't have the time or desire. #2 I couldn't bring myself to listen to all the petty BS. #3 Apparently I'm not a big enough pussy to recognize images or phrases that may throw the emotionally delicate flowers around here into state of shock.

Posted: **Wed May 18, 2016 5:34 pm**

Not sure what Doombrain is getting at here

Posted: **Wed May 18, 2016 5:36 pm**

YourGrandpa wrote:#3 Apparently I'm not a big enough pussy to recognize images or phrases that may throw the emotionally delicate flowers around here into state of shock.

My god, you really do keep regurgitating the same old bullshit that has been refuted a dozen times already.

Posted: **Wed May 18, 2016 5:36 pm**

Eraser wrote:YGP, if you don't agree with the rules and don't wish to abide them, then you can leave these forums on your own discretion.

I don't have to agree with how the rules are applied. I'm also not compelled to run away from a situation because it doesn't go my way. I'm an adult. I'm satisfied with voicing my opinion and moving on.

Posted: **Wed May 18, 2016 5:42 pm**

Eraser wrote:My god, you really do keep regurgitating the same old bullshit that has been refuted a dozen times already.

It's been refuted. SO WHAT. That doesn't make you or me right. It's a matter of opinion. Because there are no rules in place that specifically identify dead animals as "gore".

Posted: **Wed May 18, 2016 5:46 pm**

YourGrandpa wrote:voicing my opinion and moving on.

More like crying a river of salty tears that just keeps coming and coming and coming

Posted: **Wed May 18, 2016 5:49 pm**

YourGrandpa wrote:
Eraser wrote:My god, you really do keep regurgitating the same old bullshit that has been refuted a dozen times already.
It's been refuted. SO WHAT.

Jesus...

Posted: **Wed May 18, 2016 5:51 pm**

YourGrandpa wrote:I'm satisfied with voicing my opinion and moving on.

I may change my sig after years of this God/kitten joke.

Posted: **Wed May 18, 2016 5:54 pm**

It's a keeper for sure

Posted: **Wed May 18, 2016 6:02 pm**

YourGrandpa wrote:
Eraser wrote:My god, you really do keep regurgitating the same old bullshit that has been refuted a dozen times already.
It's been refuted. SO WHAT. That doesn't make you or me right. It's a matter of opinion. Because there are no rules in place that specifically identify dead animals as "gore".

gore
Noun

Blood, especially that from a wound when thickened due to exposure to the air.
Murder, bloodshed, violence.

Posted: **Wed May 18, 2016 6:11 pm**

Didn't read the whole thread, just the latest 2 pages. But, if I'd want to see a pic of a dead deer caused by a delivery gone wrong I'd go to 4chan. If I wanted to post a pic of a dead deer caused by a delivery gone wrong I'd go to 4chan. Jesus.

edit: wanted to say that pics of such nature don't belong here without an educational perspective +spoiler but there are other sites where it just doesn't matter.

Posted: **Wed May 18, 2016 6:33 pm**

Transient wrote:
YourGrandpa wrote:I'm satisfied with voicing my opinion and moving on.
I may change my sig after years of this God/kitten joke.

We should all pick a different Gramps quote and make it our sig...

Posted: **Wed May 18, 2016 7:43 pm**

Posted: **Wed May 18, 2016 8:21 pm**

Still waiting for gwamps to get on his mobility scooter and do this whole "moving on" thing he keeps frothing about.

Posted: **Wed May 18, 2016 9:02 pm**

As if the constant rebuttal over an opinion is somehow a one sided conversation.

Get comfortable with the fact that you're a bunch of pussies and move on.

Posted: **Wed May 18, 2016 9:07 pm**

YourGrandpa wrote:
Eraser wrote:My god, you really do keep regurgitating the same old bullshit that has been refuted a dozen times already.
It's been refuted. SO WHAT. That doesn't make you or me right. It's a matter of opinion.

Refute: to prove to be false or erroneous, as an opinion or charge. 2. to prove (a person) to be in error.

It makes you wrong numb-nuts. God you're stupid.

Posted: **Thu May 19, 2016 12:19 am**

YourGrandpa wrote:As if the constant rebuttal over an opinion is somehow a one sided conversation.

Get comfortable with the fact that you're a bunch of pussies and move on.

Posted: **Thu May 19, 2016 12:40 pm**

HM-PuFFNSTuFF wrote:Refute: to prove to be false or erroneous, as an opinion or charge. 2. to prove (a person) to be in error.

It makes you wrong numb-nuts. God you're stupid.

Refuting a discretionary rule is just about as retarded as you...

Posted: **Thu May 19, 2016 12:48 pm**

YourGrandpa wrote:Refuting a discretionary rule is just about as retarded as you...

I get you're kind of slow witted [s]today[/s], but it's not the rule that's being refuted, it's your arguments.

Posted: **Thu May 19, 2016 1:25 pm**

YourGrandpa wrote:
HM-PuFFNSTuFF wrote:Refute: to prove to be false or erroneous, as an opinion or charge. 2. to prove (a person) to be in error.

It makes you wrong numb-nuts. God you're stupid.
Refuting a discretionary rule is just about as retarded as you...

You didn't know what refute means. It's cool brah. No need to obfuscate.

Posted: **Thu May 19, 2016 4:07 pm**

Eraser wrote:
YourGrandpa wrote:Refuting a discretionary rule is just about as retarded as you...
I get you're kind of slow witted [s]today[/s], but it's not the rule that's being refuted, it's your arguments.

Refuting my opinion is just as retarded. FFS.

Posted: **Thu May 19, 2016 4:10 pm**

HM-PuFFNSTuFF wrote: You didn't know what refute means. It's cool brah. No need to obfuscate.

I certainly did. Which is why I said, "SO WHAT". Calm down brah.

Posted: **Thu May 19, 2016 4:22 pm**

Still waiting for you to move on...

Posted: **Thu May 19, 2016 4:30 pm**

Quake3World

Blood bath in paradise...

Re: Blood bath in paradise...

Re: Blood bath in paradise...

Re: Blood bath in paradise...

Re: Blood bath in paradise...

Re: Blood bath in paradise...

Re: Blood bath in paradise...

Re: Blood bath in paradise...

Re: Blood bath in paradise...

Re: Blood bath in paradise...

Re: Blood bath in paradise...

Re: Blood bath in paradise...

Re: Blood bath in paradise...

Re: Blood bath in paradise...

Re: Blood bath in paradise...

Re: Blood bath in paradise...

Re: Blood bath in paradise...

Re: Blood bath in paradise...

Re: Blood bath in paradise...

Re: Blood bath in paradise...

Re: Blood bath in paradise...

Re: Blood bath in paradise...

Re: Blood bath in paradise...

Re: Blood bath in paradise...

Re: Blood bath in paradise...

Re: Blood bath in paradise...