What would you give for this?

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
User avatar
Captain
Posts: 20410
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2006 2:50 am

Re: What would you give for this?

Post by Captain »

YourGrandpa wrote:I've ridden before. Though it has been several years. However, an 1130cc bike for someone who's 6'2" 190+lbs isn't "big". But I appreciate your concerns.
Your hideous beast of a wife doesn't count as riding experience, fatty.
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Re: What would you give for this?

Post by Doombrain »

Κracus wrote:They aren't called golf's anymore in North America. it's either a GTI or a VW Rabbit and I think it's awesome.
You don't own one.
Tsakali
Posts: 7175
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2000 8:00 am

Re: What would you give for this?

Post by Tsakali »

EtUL wrote:This thread needs less dummies, more motorcycles

Image
Yes i would also gladly go with something like this... as i am searching for used bikes, im starting to appreciate the rawness of that style.
EtUL
Posts: 3307
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2001 7:00 am

Re: What would you give for this?

Post by EtUL »

Naked standards are the best.

Image

my cheap japenese one
Image

Image
or more classic style

Image
Tsakali
Posts: 7175
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2000 8:00 am

Re: What would you give for this?

Post by Tsakali »

man, that black...dukati makes the naked style look easy to look good :) I prefer it over all the other options you posted... but of course, it's a fucking dukati.

however that old school white honda is pretty magnificent looking too.

can I get that naked look with pretty much any stripped down streetbike, or do some look better than others?

But I guess not, the one you own unfortunately has that futuristic shape build into the lights, hud,and frame ...that kinda takes away from the look
LawL
Posts: 18358
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2006 5:49 am

Re: What would you give for this?

Post by LawL »

YourGrandpa wrote:
LawL wrote: BLAH BLAH BLAH more ignorance BLAH BLAH BLAH
Dear Upset internet user,

I realize that you must have the last word on everything, could never admit you were wrong and would defend the most retarded of positions until the end of time. However, if you are still missing the point or unclear on the actual definition of the word assume (not the made up definition you've manufactured to support your obsessive argument) I'm going paint you a picture so clear, even someone with your unwillingness to accept ideas other than your own can understand.

This is GKY's original statement:
DumbFatGuy wrote:you'd be crazy starting off with a big Harley (lol redneck bike, etc) and should get a smaller bike instead.


At no point in this statement does GKY reference the specific size of anything. He in fact says "big Harley" as opposed to "smaller bike". Harleys aren't known for being fast and powerful race bikes. They're known for being loud an colossal cruisers. But that's neither here nor there. The FACT is, GKY doesn't specify the "big" or the "small". One would have to assume it was the physical size or the size of the engine or possibly some other inane observation rattling around inside the head of an angry computer nerd. So the only way for YOU to decide that GKY was referring to the engine size was to apply the definition of the word Assume ("suppose to be the case, without proof").

This is my original response:
YourGrandpa wrote:I've ridden before. Though it has been several years. However, an 1130cc bike for someone who's 6'2" 190+lbs isn't "big". But I appreciate your concerns.
You'll notice I ASSUMED GKY was either referencing the size of the engine or the physical size of the bike. Because I addressed them both in my response. Could I have worded it better? Sure. But that doesn't negate the content. I was stating that I didn't think an 1130 cc engine or the physical size the bike would be too big for ME. Even a "12 year old" could figure that out.

Now I know you're going to have to say something. Most likely continuing to ignore the actual definition of the word assume or continued criticism of me somehow not knowing there's a difference between motor and bike size. But before your incredibly unoriginal OCD kicks in and causes you to draft another ridiculous response (similar in context and structure to the one I've provided above), think. You can't change GKY's original statement and you can clearly see I understood the gist of what GKY was trying to say. So unless you can change the definition of the word assume, you're going to have to come to grips with the fact you're wrong.

BTW, further discussion of this pointless anyway. I'm not even buying the bike.
Unfortunately your wall of upset text doesn't change the fact that anyone who isn't a moron and has more than 5 minutes riding experience knows that when someone recommends starting out on a smaller bike they are referring to the power output, not the physical size of the bike. GFY even went on to blatantly point this out to you because you're so retarded. Yet here you are still crying about assumptions. lol you're one fat, bald, moronic, redneck cunt. :olo:
Thick, solid and tight in all the right places.
YourGrandpa
Posts: 10074
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2000 7:00 am

Re: What would you give for this?

Post by YourGrandpa »

Just as I predicted. Continuing to ignore the actual definition of the word assume and criticizing me of somehow not understanding the difference between motor size and bike size.

I win TWICE!

GG
LawL
Posts: 18358
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2006 5:49 am

Re: What would you give for this?

Post by LawL »

Just as I expected, too stupid to understand that you're the only moron desperately clinging to the idea that anything was assumed.

You lose, as always.
Thick, solid and tight in all the right places.
User avatar
Captain
Posts: 20410
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2006 2:50 am

Re: What would you give for this?

Post by Captain »

Time for Gwamps to disappear until the next time something marginally interesting (extremely dull to normal people) happens in his life again :olo:
EtUL
Posts: 3307
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2001 7:00 am

Re: What would you give for this?

Post by EtUL »

Tsakali wrote:man, that black...dukati makes the naked style look easy to look good :) I prefer it over all the other options you posted... but of course, it's a fucking dukati.

however that old school white honda is pretty magnificent looking too.

can I get that naked look with pretty much any stripped down streetbike, or do some look better than others?

But I guess not, the one you own unfortunately has that futuristic shape build into the lights, hud,and frame ...that kinda takes away from the look
Honda just released a new CB that looks like the old ones

Image

You get the naked look best with bikes that are meant to be naked. You can see that a lot of things on them like wires, overflow tanks, etc are hidden and overall they have a pretty clean look. Bikes with fairings usually aren't as pretty underneath the plastic.
YourGrandpa
Posts: 10074
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2000 7:00 am

Re: What would you give for this?

Post by YourGrandpa »

LawL wrote:Just as I expected, too stupid to understand that you're the only moron desperately clinging to the idea that anything was assumed.

You lose, as always.
I crushed the parrot into fantasy land.

LawLy want a cracker?
YourGrandpa
Posts: 10074
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2000 7:00 am

Re: What would you give for this?

Post by YourGrandpa »

EtUL wrote:You get the naked look best with bikes that are meant to be naked. You can see that a lot of things on them like wires, overflow tanks, etc are hidden and overall they have a pretty clean look. Bikes with fairings usually aren't as pretty underneath the plastic.
I never cared much for the fairing look either. I like the stripped down utilitarian look. Black and aluminum, with mag wheels.
LawL
Posts: 18358
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2006 5:49 am

Re: What would you give for this?

Post by LawL »

YourGrandpa wrote:I crushed the parrot into fantasy land.

LawLy want a cracker?
You got crushed due to your never ending stupidity and ignorance. But then again what else is new. :olo:
Thick, solid and tight in all the right places.
User avatar
Scourge
Posts: 15559
Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2002 8:00 am

Re: What would you give for this?

Post by Scourge »

EtUL wrote:This thread needs less dummies, more motorcycles
Ok.

[lvlshot]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/95659625/breakout2.jpg[/lvlshot]
Tsakali
Posts: 7175
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2000 8:00 am

Re: What would you give for this?

Post by Tsakali »

EtUL wrote: Honda just released a new CB that looks like the old ones ...
You get the naked look best with bikes that are meant to be naked. You can see that a lot of things on them like wires, overflow tanks, etc are hidden and overall they have a pretty clean look. Bikes with fairings usually aren't as pretty underneath the plastic.

that's a very nice option, will keep that in mind. :up:
YourGrandpa
Posts: 10074
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2000 7:00 am

Re: What would you give for this?

Post by YourGrandpa »

Scourge wrote: Ok.

[lvlshot]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/95659625/breakout2.jpg[/lvlshot]
Looks nice. Simple and clean.
Post Reply