Page 6 of 16
Re: mars landing
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 7:10 pm
by chopov
I read somewhere, that photo was taken through a transparent dust cover on the lens, which istn't taken off yet.
Re: mars landing
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 7:20 pm
by TruthfulLiar
wait, what
canted slope, always?
bullshit
Re: mars landing
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 8:20 pm
by GONNAFISTYA
Memphis wrote:xer0s wrote:srsly?
wherever you stand on mars, you're facing downhill.
I srsly lolled at this.
Re: mars landing
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 8:25 pm
by xer0s
srsly?
Re: mars landing
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 8:43 pm
by Transient
Yeah, the planet is crooked.

Re: mars landing
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 9:02 pm
by seremtan
Curiosity needs a special handbrake to stop it rolling off the edge of Mars
Re: mars landing
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 9:22 pm
by Tsakali
/changes channel
Re: mars landing
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 9:48 pm
by Whiskey 7
Tsakali wrote:......... I'd pay 5-10 grand for a sit before I'd have to reevaluate my enthusiasm on the issue.
What would you pay realistically?
I'd pay that much, but given these low Earth orbital flights take approx, 15 - 30 minutes it would be a quick trip.
For the same $5k dollars today you can jump in an aircraft and experience weightlessness. Not the same though
click
Current cost (?) ; Virgin Galactic in Vehicle: SpaceShipTwo; Price; $200,000 per passenger
Re: mars landing
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 7:31 am
by Eraser
Memphis wrote:xer0s wrote:srsly?
wherever you stand on mars, you're facing downhill.
ffs

Re: mars landing
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 4:01 pm
by Doombrain
Heads up
Re: mars landing
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 4:37 pm
by xer0s
Input! Innnput!
Re: mars landing
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 4:51 pm
by Transient
Re: mars landing
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 5:14 pm
by bitWISE
[lvlshot]http://www.uahirise.org/images/2012/details/cut/mt-sharp-oblique.jpg[/lvlshot]
"Amazing High Resolution Photo from the HiRISE Camera on MRO of the Central Mound of Mt. Sharp taken 24 Hours after the MSL Landed "
Re: mars landing
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 5:32 pm
by xer0s
Central mound

Re: mars landing
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 5:33 pm
by menkent
that instant-stick-communicator is pretty funny. minimum distance from earth to mars is 54600000km. let's say the stick has a mass of 1kg per 100m (a very light stick, as these things go). Can you imagine the force required to even jiggle a 546 million kilogram stick? For comparison, that's about 75x the mass of the Eiffel Tower.
edit: also not sure about the physics of that sort of thing but I assume the entire stick wouldn't move as one piece... more likely some sort of wave propagating along it.

Re: mars landing
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 5:41 pm
by obsidian
bitWISE wrote:"Amazing High Resolution Photo from the HiRISE Camera on MRO of the Central Mound of Mt. Sharp taken 24 Hours after the MSL Landed "

Wish I had a bunch of monitors arranged next to each other to use that as a wallpaper.
Re: mars landing
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 8:26 pm
by seremtan
^ this
NASA have given no thought whatsoever to the desktop market

Re: mars landing
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 8:27 pm
by Tsakali
that's big enough to print, I might just do that.
Re: mars landing
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2012 12:14 am
by Whiskey 7
bitWISE wrote:[lvlshot] large image Thanks

[/lvlshot]
"Amazing High Resolution Photo from the HiRISE Camera on MRO of the Central Mound of Mt. Sharp taken 24 Hours after the MSL Landed "
Bottom left and elsewhere colours/texture patterns look like water doesn't it

Re: mars landing
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2012 12:21 am
by seremtan
it isn't water
Re: mars landing
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2012 10:57 am
by Tsakali
Re: mars landing
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2012 11:11 am
by xer0s
Awesome.
Re: mars landing
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2012 4:23 pm
by Plan B
Re: mars landing
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2012 4:38 pm
by GONNAFISTYA
That's not the same rover, you cyster-humping douchebag.
Re: mars landing
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2012 4:44 pm
by seremtan
^ awesome
and no, obviously it's not the same rover
derp