mars landing

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
Post Reply
chopov
Posts: 1046
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 12:27 pm

Re: mars landing

Post by chopov »

I read somewhere, that photo was taken through a transparent dust cover on the lens, which istn't taken off yet.
[color=#800000]I'm a pervert. But in a romantic kind of way.[/color]
TruthfulLiar
Posts: 351
Joined: Sun Dec 11, 2005 9:05 am

Re: mars landing

Post by TruthfulLiar »

wait, what

canted slope, always?

bullshit
User avatar
GONNAFISTYA
Posts: 13369
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:20 pm

Re: mars landing

Post by GONNAFISTYA »

Memphis wrote:
xer0s wrote:srsly?
wherever you stand on mars, you're facing downhill.
I srsly lolled at this.
xer0s
Posts: 12447
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2001 8:00 am

Re: mars landing

Post by xer0s »

srsly?
User avatar
Transient
Posts: 11357
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2001 8:00 am

Re: mars landing

Post by Transient »

Yeah, the planet is crooked. :up:
[quote="YourGrandpa"]I'm satisfied with voicing my opinion and moving on.[/quote]
User avatar
seremtan
Posts: 36013
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 8:00 am

Re: mars landing

Post by seremtan »

Curiosity needs a special handbrake to stop it rolling off the edge of Mars
Tsakali
Posts: 7175
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2000 8:00 am

Re: mars landing

Post by Tsakali »

/changes channel
User avatar
Whiskey 7
Posts: 9709
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2001 7:00 am

Re: mars landing

Post by Whiskey 7 »

Tsakali wrote:......... I'd pay 5-10 grand for a sit before I'd have to reevaluate my enthusiasm on the issue.

What would you pay realistically?
I'd pay that much, but given these low Earth orbital flights take approx, 15 - 30 minutes it would be a quick trip.

For the same $5k dollars today you can jump in an aircraft and experience weightlessness. Not the same though :smirk:
click

Current cost (?) ; Virgin Galactic in Vehicle: SpaceShipTwo; Price; $200,000 per passenger
[color=#FFBF00]Physicist [/color][color=#FF4000]of[/color] [color=#0000FF]Q3W[/color]
User avatar
Eraser
Posts: 19177
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Re: mars landing

Post by Eraser »

Memphis wrote:
xer0s wrote:srsly?
wherever you stand on mars, you're facing downhill.
ffs :olo:
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Re: mars landing

Post by Doombrain »

Image

Heads up
xer0s
Posts: 12447
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2001 8:00 am

Re: mars landing

Post by xer0s »

Input! Innnput!
User avatar
Transient
Posts: 11357
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2001 8:00 am

Re: mars landing

Post by Transient »

:olo:
[quote="YourGrandpa"]I'm satisfied with voicing my opinion and moving on.[/quote]
bitWISE
Posts: 10704
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 1999 8:00 am

Re: mars landing

Post by bitWISE »

[lvlshot]http://www.uahirise.org/images/2012/details/cut/mt-sharp-oblique.jpg[/lvlshot]

"Amazing High Resolution Photo from the HiRISE Camera on MRO of the Central Mound of Mt. Sharp taken 24 Hours after the MSL Landed "
xer0s
Posts: 12447
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2001 8:00 am

Re: mars landing

Post by xer0s »

Central mound :drool:
menkent
Posts: 2629
Joined: Sun Jul 23, 2000 7:00 am

Re: mars landing

Post by menkent »

that instant-stick-communicator is pretty funny. minimum distance from earth to mars is 54600000km. let's say the stick has a mass of 1kg per 100m (a very light stick, as these things go). Can you imagine the force required to even jiggle a 546 million kilogram stick? For comparison, that's about 75x the mass of the Eiffel Tower.

edit: also not sure about the physics of that sort of thing but I assume the entire stick wouldn't move as one piece... more likely some sort of wave propagating along it. :shrug:
obsidian
Posts: 10970
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2002 8:00 am

Re: mars landing

Post by obsidian »

bitWISE wrote:"Amazing High Resolution Photo from the HiRISE Camera on MRO of the Central Mound of Mt. Sharp taken 24 Hours after the MSL Landed "
:eek: Wish I had a bunch of monitors arranged next to each other to use that as a wallpaper.
[size=85][url=http://gtkradiant.com]GtkRadiant[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com]Q3Map2[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com/docs/shader_manual/]Shader Manual[/url][/size]
User avatar
seremtan
Posts: 36013
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 8:00 am

Re: mars landing

Post by seremtan »

^ this

NASA have given no thought whatsoever to the desktop market :mad:
Tsakali
Posts: 7175
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2000 8:00 am

Re: mars landing

Post by Tsakali »

that's big enough to print, I might just do that.
User avatar
Whiskey 7
Posts: 9709
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2001 7:00 am

Re: mars landing

Post by Whiskey 7 »

bitWISE wrote:[lvlshot] large image Thanks :up: [/lvlshot]

"Amazing High Resolution Photo from the HiRISE Camera on MRO of the Central Mound of Mt. Sharp taken 24 Hours after the MSL Landed "
Bottom left and elsewhere colours/texture patterns look like water doesn't it :confused:
[color=#FFBF00]Physicist [/color][color=#FF4000]of[/color] [color=#0000FF]Q3W[/color]
User avatar
seremtan
Posts: 36013
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 8:00 am

Re: mars landing

Post by seremtan »

it isn't water
Tsakali
Posts: 7175
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2000 8:00 am

Re: mars landing

Post by Tsakali »

Image
:ninja:
xer0s
Posts: 12447
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2001 8:00 am

Re: mars landing

Post by xer0s »

Awesome.
Plan B
Posts: 3599
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2001 8:00 am

Re: mars landing

Post by Plan B »

User avatar
GONNAFISTYA
Posts: 13369
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:20 pm

Re: mars landing

Post by GONNAFISTYA »

Plan B wrote:360 panoramic
That's not the same rover, you cyster-humping douchebag.
User avatar
seremtan
Posts: 36013
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 8:00 am

Re: mars landing

Post by seremtan »

^ awesome

and no, obviously it's not the same rover

derp
Post Reply