mars landing
Re: mars landing
I read somewhere, that photo was taken through a transparent dust cover on the lens, which istn't taken off yet.
[color=#800000]I'm a pervert. But in a romantic kind of way.[/color]
-
- Posts: 351
- Joined: Sun Dec 11, 2005 9:05 am
Re: mars landing
wait, what
canted slope, always?
bullshit
canted slope, always?
bullshit
- GONNAFISTYA
- Posts: 13369
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:20 pm
Re: mars landing
I srsly lolled at this.Memphis wrote:wherever you stand on mars, you're facing downhill.xer0s wrote:srsly?
Re: mars landing
Yeah, the planet is crooked. 

[quote="YourGrandpa"]I'm satisfied with voicing my opinion and moving on.[/quote]
Re: mars landing
Curiosity needs a special handbrake to stop it rolling off the edge of Mars
Re: mars landing
I'd pay that much, but given these low Earth orbital flights take approx, 15 - 30 minutes it would be a quick trip.Tsakali wrote:......... I'd pay 5-10 grand for a sit before I'd have to reevaluate my enthusiasm on the issue.
What would you pay realistically?
For the same $5k dollars today you can jump in an aircraft and experience weightlessness. Not the same though

click
Current cost (?) ; Virgin Galactic in Vehicle: SpaceShipTwo; Price; $200,000 per passenger
[color=#FFBF00]Physicist [/color][color=#FF4000]of[/color] [color=#0000FF]Q3W[/color]
Re: mars landing
ffsMemphis wrote:wherever you stand on mars, you're facing downhill.xer0s wrote:srsly?

Re: mars landing
[lvlshot]http://www.uahirise.org/images/2012/details/cut/mt-sharp-oblique.jpg[/lvlshot]
"Amazing High Resolution Photo from the HiRISE Camera on MRO of the Central Mound of Mt. Sharp taken 24 Hours after the MSL Landed "
"Amazing High Resolution Photo from the HiRISE Camera on MRO of the Central Mound of Mt. Sharp taken 24 Hours after the MSL Landed "
Re: mars landing
that instant-stick-communicator is pretty funny. minimum distance from earth to mars is 54600000km. let's say the stick has a mass of 1kg per 100m (a very light stick, as these things go). Can you imagine the force required to even jiggle a 546 million kilogram stick? For comparison, that's about 75x the mass of the Eiffel Tower.
edit: also not sure about the physics of that sort of thing but I assume the entire stick wouldn't move as one piece... more likely some sort of wave propagating along it.
edit: also not sure about the physics of that sort of thing but I assume the entire stick wouldn't move as one piece... more likely some sort of wave propagating along it.

Re: mars landing
bitWISE wrote:"Amazing High Resolution Photo from the HiRISE Camera on MRO of the Central Mound of Mt. Sharp taken 24 Hours after the MSL Landed "

[size=85][url=http://gtkradiant.com]GtkRadiant[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com]Q3Map2[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com/docs/shader_manual/]Shader Manual[/url][/size]
Re: mars landing
^ this
NASA have given no thought whatsoever to the desktop market
NASA have given no thought whatsoever to the desktop market

Re: mars landing
that's big enough to print, I might just do that.
Re: mars landing
Bottom left and elsewhere colours/texture patterns look like water doesn't itbitWISE wrote:[lvlshot] large image Thanks[/lvlshot]
"Amazing High Resolution Photo from the HiRISE Camera on MRO of the Central Mound of Mt. Sharp taken 24 Hours after the MSL Landed "

[color=#FFBF00]Physicist [/color][color=#FF4000]of[/color] [color=#0000FF]Q3W[/color]
- GONNAFISTYA
- Posts: 13369
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:20 pm
Re: mars landing
That's not the same rover, you cyster-humping douchebag.Plan B wrote:360 panoramic
Re: mars landing
^ awesome
and no, obviously it's not the same rover
derp
and no, obviously it's not the same rover
derp