Re: the galaxy s3?
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 3:12 pm
I don't have a problem with these other phones, I just enjoy my iPhone...
Page 6 of 10
Re: the galaxy s3?
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 3:28 pm
Samsung fanboys enjoy iPhones too... just cheaper knockoff versions of them..
Re: the galaxy s3?
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 3:51 pm
yea the iphone has a nice bright clear display it looks just like the on on my old 2002 color sony clie!
it had low res too and wow it just sucked back the battery like crazy!
looked good for back then tho
it had low res too and wow it just sucked back the battery like crazy!
looked good for back then tho
Re: the galaxy s3?
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 6:53 pm
lol, Apple is so butthurt about Android phones being better in every possible way, so instead of improving their own shit they just try to hinder their competition. Get mad bro.scared? wrote:Lol another reason not to buy this silly phone...
Re: the galaxy s3?
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 7:47 pm
I would actually love to switch to a droid phone...they all have sucked so far so im just waiting for a real one to be released...
Re: the galaxy s3?
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:38 pm
on an unrelated note, rumour has it that the cheapest MS Surface will be $1000
fuck that
fuck that
Re: the galaxy s3?
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:56 pm
lol fucking idiots
Re: the galaxy s3?
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:14 pm
does the stylus have pressure levels? I wouldn't think it does...Nightshade wrote:Excellent, very accurate and extremely responsive. It's as good or better than the Jot Pro I got from ThinkGeek for my tablet. I was hoping that the Note stylus (S Pen or whatever they call it) would work on my Thrive, but it's not compatible with the Thrive's screen.Big Kahuna Burger wrote:
how is the stylus?
Re: the galaxy s3?
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 10:15 pm
especially since you can pick up an Asus Transformer with ICS for significantly lessTsakali wrote:lol fucking idiots
Re: the galaxy s3?
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2012 6:55 am
Sounds like bullshit to me. MS has said they'll price the RT version similar to existing tablet devices. The pro version will probably be a bit more expensive because it competes with MacBook Air.seremtan wrote:on an unrelated note, rumour has it that the cheapest MS Surface will be $1000
fuck that
Just let common sense here work for a moment and you'll figure out how ridiculous the notion of a $1000 Surface RT will be.
Re: the galaxy s3?
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2012 11:55 am
This is a stupid statement, even from you. By your logic then, Apple fanboys enjoy Xerox Altos, too...just cheaper knockoff versions of them..shaft wrote:Samsung fanboys enjoy iPhones too... just cheaper knockoff versions of them..
Re: the galaxy s3?
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2012 12:14 pm
Nightshade, you're arguing with Geoff...
Re: the galaxy s3?
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2012 1:34 pm
shaft: Now know as geoff.
Re: the galaxy s3?
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2012 2:25 pm
U lose...next...
Re: the galaxy s3?
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2012 4:00 pm
Nightshade wrote:This is a stupid statement, even from you. By your logic then, Apple fanboys enjoy Xerox Altos, too...just cheaper knockoff versions of them..shaft wrote:Samsung fanboys enjoy iPhones too... just cheaper knockoff versions of them..
If it was released in 1973 with shittier software and more pixelation your analogy might work. I see fanboyism has warped your logic.
Re: the galaxy s3?
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2012 4:59 pm
Had a feeling you'd be too stupid to get that.
Re: the galaxy s3?
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2012 5:11 pm
uh, no. the $1000 price tag is based off actual price announced by a swedish retailer. also, today i saw a UK retailer confirm this with a tentative £650 price tag (can't remember names of either, or links, but i read about the UK one on BBC site this morning)Eraser wrote:Sounds like bullshit to me. MS has said they'll price the RT version similar to existing tablet devices. The pro version will probably be a bit more expensive because it competes with MacBook Air.seremtan wrote:on an unrelated note, rumour has it that the cheapest MS Surface will be $1000
fuck that
Just let common sense here work for a moment and you'll figure out how ridiculous the notion of a $1000 Surface RT will be.
maybe they're wrong, but don't shoot the messenger or i'll shoot your dad in the ass
with my cock
Re: the galaxy s3?
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2012 5:12 pm
real men call it a penis... 'cock' just sounds overcompensating.
Re: the galaxy s3?
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2012 5:36 pm
i'm really liking my s3!
Re: the galaxy s3?
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2012 6:15 pm
Lol if ms tries to sell surface for $1000+ they are over...
Re: the galaxy s3?
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2012 8:37 pm
Truthscared? wrote:Lol if ms tries to sell surface for $1000+ they are over...
Re: the galaxy s3?
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2012 8:44 pm
You realise MS can afford a flop, don't you?
Re: the galaxy s3?
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2012 8:53 pm
scared? wrote:U lose...next...
Re: the galaxy s3?
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2012 8:59 pm
http://news.cnet.com/8301-10805_3-57480 ... k-and-$2k/
if it is, shame
MS should move to squash this rumour is it isn't trueDespite all chatter about Microsoft's upcoming Surface tablet being competitively priced, rumors are swirling that it might cost $1,000 at the cheapest, according to The Next Web.
This news comes via a Swedish Web site that lists prices for all four of the future models, including the Windows RT and Window 8 Pro editions. The cheapest of the four models has the price tag of 6,990 kroner, which is $1,002, and the most expensive is 14,990 kroner, equaling $2,150.
if it is, shame
Re: the galaxy s3?
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2012 9:45 pm
Just bought a 32GB micro SD card for my Galaxy S2. Feels good man.