Page 6 of 6

Re: LED vs plasma...

Posted: Tue Dec 15, 2009 8:24 pm
by Fender
I didn't think plasmas needed the extra Hz. I thought only LCDs needed the extra Hz to be smooth.

Re: LED vs plasma...

Posted: Wed Dec 16, 2009 12:28 am
by Deathshroud
Thats the thing, when playing 24p content the refresh rate is typically lowered to a multiple of 24. Which is why plasma's seem like they might not be such a great option anymore.

Re: LED vs plasma...

Posted: Wed Dec 16, 2009 2:30 am
by Mr.Sparkle!
If you're going to get a plasma then get the panasonic v10 series. Remember, when Pioneer went down, Panasonic took 2/3rd of their engineers and all of their patents. Panasonic is light years ahead of their competition in the plasma field. With the refresh rate, nowadays with the new 240hz refresh rate, you can't really tell the difference from 120hz. It's all about the video processing within the TV. Shoot me a msg if you have any questions, I work for Samsung.

Re: LED vs plasma...

Posted: Wed Dec 16, 2009 3:30 am
by DTS
Mr.Sparkle! wrote:If you're going to get a plasma then get the panasonic v10 series. Remember, when Pioneer went down, Panasonic took 2/3rd of their engineers and all of their patents. Panasonic is light years ahead of their competition in the plasma field. With the refresh rate, nowadays with the new 240hz refresh rate, you can't really tell the difference from 120hz. It's all about the video processing within the TV. Shoot me a msg if you have any questions, I work for Samsung.
If you work for Samsung, why are you recommending people get a Panasonic TV? :olo: PR disaster :)

Nah, it's good that you're not biased. I just found the idea funny :)

Re: LED vs plasma...

Posted: Wed Dec 16, 2009 4:32 am
by Hannibal
Deathshroud wrote:Thats the thing, when playing 24p content the refresh rate is typically lowered to a multiple of 24. Which is why plasma's seem like they might not be such a great option anymore.
Most mid to upper tier plasma sets come as 24p capable...just like their LCD counterparts.

Re: LED vs plasma...

Posted: Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:20 am
by Doombrain
Deathshroud wrote:Thats the thing, when playing 24p content the refresh rate is typically lowered to a multiple of 24. Which is why plasma's seem like they might not be such a great option anymore.
lol

Re: LED vs plasma...

Posted: Wed Dec 16, 2009 12:18 pm
by Fender
Fender wrote:I didn't think plasmas needed the extra Hz. I thought only LCDs needed the extra Hz to be smooth.
Juggs? DB?

Re: LED vs plasma...

Posted: Wed Dec 16, 2009 12:27 pm
by shaft

Re: LED vs plasma...

Posted: Wed Dec 16, 2009 12:47 pm
by Doombrain
Fender wrote:
Fender wrote:I didn't think plasmas needed the extra Hz. I thought only LCDs needed the extra Hz to be smooth.
Juggs? DB?
Anything but 1080p 24 runs at 400/600hz and is super smooth, better than any LCD.

For out and out IQ on HD you still can't beat a good LCD, but I’m talking about real pixel peeping shit here as in standing right next to a frozen image and getting a loop out.. For all overall IQ you can't beat a modern plasma.

Just last night I was watching Discovery HD channel, I still find it amazing.

It’s just a shame they are so thick and heavy.

Re: LED vs plasma...

Posted: Wed Dec 16, 2009 12:51 pm
by +JuggerNaut+
^this. and any top of the line lcd's unnoticeable pixel smoothness is trumped by plasmas black level.

Re: LED vs plasma...

Posted: Wed Dec 16, 2009 12:54 pm
by Doombrain
^this.

Re: LED vs plasma...

Posted: Wed Dec 16, 2009 1:05 pm
by Jackal
Doombrain wrote:http://shop.panasonic.co.uk/invt/txp50s10b
We just bought the same TV. Though the one I got was a 54".

Re: LED vs plasma...

Posted: Wed Dec 16, 2009 1:39 pm
by Doombrain
that's OK, if it's all you can afford.

Re: LED vs plasma...

Posted: Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:03 pm
by shaft
Thin and light plasma: http://signature.crutchfield.com/s_305P ... l=Y&tp=161

Re: LED vs plasma...

Posted: Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:09 pm
by +JuggerNaut+
i won't utilize the space behind my current plasma for anything.

Re: LED vs plasma...

Posted: Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:10 pm
by MKJ
oddly enough, my modem/router is there :owned:

Re: LED vs plasma...

Posted: Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:49 pm
by Doombrain
shaft wrote:Thin and light plasma: http://signature.crutchfield.com/s_305P ... l=Y&tp=161
nice

Re: LED vs plasma...

Posted: Wed Dec 16, 2009 10:27 pm
by YourGrandpa
shaft wrote:Thin and light plasma: http://signature.crutchfield.com/s_305P ... l=Y&tp=161
Sweet TV.

Re: LED vs plasma...

Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2009 4:15 am
by Mr.Sparkle!
DTS wrote:
Mr.Sparkle! wrote:If you're going to get a plasma then get the panasonic v10 series. Remember, when Pioneer went down, Panasonic took 2/3rd of their engineers and all of their patents. Panasonic is light years ahead of their competition in the plasma field. With the refresh rate, nowadays with the new 240hz refresh rate, you can't really tell the difference from 120hz. It's all about the video processing within the TV. Shoot me a msg if you have any questions, I work for Samsung.
If you work for Samsung, why are you recommending people get a Panasonic TV? :olo: PR disaster :)

Nah, it's good that you're not biased. I just found the idea funny :)
I'm not going to bash another company or tell lies when there are better products out there. If someone is in the market for a LED display then I would tell them to get the 8500 Series. Samsung's 860 series is still awesome but there are better plasma displays out there.