Page 6 of 7
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2005 1:10 am
by Tsakali_
wake me up when this thread is over
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2005 1:30 am
by Guest
Kaziganthe wrote:Kracus, you're a dumb piece of trash, ok? All you're doing is trying to back up your point of view by saying "oh, it's bogus, the bible can be disproven, gimme proof why you believe in god... blah blah" And then you just rant some more about how religion is wrong, and how people are idiots who believe in it. All you're doing is saying that they're wrong, giving no proof whatsoever that they're wrong, and then babbling on about random scientific shit. Guess what? That makes you as blinded and stupid and sheeplike and whatever other adjective you feel like using to describe the religious zealots you hate, you dumb, annoying, worthless faggot. Go on and repeat yourself again and call me a moron and a religious sheep or something, and then have a good cry on how it's all bogus like you know what you're talking about. :boohoo:
Why don't you actualy read what I posted?
I asked torm a simple question he still hasn't awnsered. It's a simple question designed to make you think. I don't see how that's calling someone an idiot or any of the shit you post. Sure I might insult some people but it's because they insulted me to begin with faggot. Look at my responses to chunk. Did I call him stupid? No I had a discussion with him and explained my point of view. At least he actualy progressed instead of what torm comes up with. Blame me if it makes you feel better but I'm not the one here that's acting like a fucking child. I've tried to have a discussion here you guys are the ones that either can't grasp what I'm talking about or just refuse to because you can't awnser. and by you guys I'm talking about those who I'm talking to in this thread.
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2005 1:32 am
by Guest
losCHUNK wrote:'you' feel that religion is untrue
Sure. I feel religion is untrue the same way I feel santa clause is untrue. I just don't understand how a person can feel one way about an imaginary being and another way about another one. Don't you find that puzzling?
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2005 1:33 am
by Dr_Watson
organized religion is such a paradoxical farse.
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2005 1:40 am
by R00k
Dr_Watson wrote:organized religion is such a preternatural fart.
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2005 1:43 am
by Guest
lol when I think about it I could see religion being created by a bunch of potheads.
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2005 1:45 am
by R00k
You see everything in terms of pot.
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2005 1:46 am
by Guest
Sometimes...
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2005 2:04 am
by Kills On Site
Agnostic, bitches. Ha, take that. Don't know, don't care
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2005 2:30 am
by Dr_Watson
Kills On Site wrote:Agnostic, bitches. Ha, take that. Don't know, don't care
thats the worst of them all.
take a stand either way, show some backbone you lazy, no ambition, little bitch.
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2005 2:43 am
by Kills On Site
Dr_Watson wrote:Kills On Site wrote:Agnostic, bitches. Ha, take that. Don't know, don't care
thats the worst of them all.
take a stand either way, show some backbone you lazy, no ambition, little bitch.
I perfer to not make a decision on something which I cannot be informed apon, and I don't want be a bigot of any side
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2005 3:17 am
by seremtan
Kaziganthe wrote:Kracus, you're a dumb piece of trash, ok? All you're doing is trying to back up your point of view by saying "oh, it's bogus, the bible can be disproven, gimme proof why you believe in god... blah blah" And then you just rant some more about how religion is wrong, and how people are idiots who believe in it. All you're doing is saying that they're wrong, giving no proof whatsoever that they're wrong, and then babbling on about random scientific shit. Guess what? That makes you as blinded and stupid and sheeplike and whatever other adjective you feel like using to describe the religious zealots you hate, you dumb, annoying, worthless faggot. Go on and repeat yourself again and call me a moron and a religious sheep or something, and then have a good cry on how it's all bogus like you know what you're talking about. :boohoo:
man, save *some* toys to throw out of the pram *later*, dude
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2005 3:20 am
by seremtan
Kills On Site wrote:Dr_Watson wrote:Kills On Site wrote:Agnostic, bitches. Ha, take that. Don't know, don't care
thats the worst of them all.
take a stand either way, show some backbone you lazy, no ambition, little bitch.
I perfer to not make a decision on something which I cannot be informed apon, and I don't want be a bigot of any side
i think it requires a leap of faith rather than rock hard erect quivering evidence, actually
see what i did there?
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2005 4:15 am
by [xeno]Julios
Hannibal wrote:I think I'm agreeable Jules but could you clarify a bit?
crap - forgot about this thread completely. (btw han the comment I made wasn't directed at you, it was just my 2 random cents)
What I meant was that the very fitting of people into these three categories constrains our notions of spirituality.
Perhaps foucault would say the same thing of our construction of sexuality. Perhaps not - never read him, just heard a lecture or two.
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2005 4:25 am
by Massive Quasars
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2005 4:43 am
by Hannibal
Dr_Watson wrote:
take a stand either way, show some backbone you lazy, no ambition, little bitch.
Why should one be forced to take a 'stand' on an existence claim that is not open to traditional methods of empirical investigation?
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2005 1:17 pm
by Foo
Kracus wrote:losCHUNK wrote:'you' feel that religion is untrue
Sure. I feel religion is untrue the same way I feel santa clause is untrue. I just don't understand how a person can feel one way about an imaginary being and another way about another one. Don't you find that puzzling?
Your occasional moments of clarity are excellent :icon14:
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2005 1:50 pm
by seremtan
santa claus is untrue? oh man....
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2005 4:53 pm
by Dek
santa was propelled to where he is by Coca Cola..
All this isn't to say that Coca-Cola didn't have anything to do with cementing that image of Santa Claus in the public consciousness. The Santa image may have been standardized before Coca-Cola adopted it for their advertisements, but Coca-Cola had a great deal to do with establishing Santa Claus as a ubiquitous Christmas figure in America at a time when the holiday was still making the transition from a religious observance to a largely secular and highly commercial celebration. In an era before color television (or commercial television of any kind), color films, and the widespread use of color in newspapers, it was Coca-Cola's magazine advertisements, billboards, and point-of-sale store displays that exposed nearly everyone in America to the modern Santa Claus image. Coca-Cola certainly helped make Santa Claus one of the most popular men in America, but they didn't invent him.
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2005 5:01 pm
by Foo
Only in America Dek, and we all know that place doesn't really matter.
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2005 6:10 pm
by [xeno]Julios
more on santa, coca cola, caffeine, drugs, here:
http://www.gladwell.com/2001/2001_07_30_a_java.htm
If you haven't already read this, do yourself a favour and do so
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2005 6:15 pm
by Foo
You realise Santa is barely mentioned in the first paragraph and then that's it, right?
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2005 6:47 pm
by plained
the book said :lol:
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2005 7:16 pm
by Tormentius
bork[e] wrote:
I'm not trying to be a smart ass, start anything ect, but neither do you. :icon22:
I never said that I did. If you read my posts I simply said that neither side had irrefutable evidence; not that my beliefs are the only right way. In fact, I specifically said that there is a possibility my belief could be wrong.
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2005 7:19 pm
by Nightshade
I don't care what this thread's about, I love seeing Kracus get his inter-ass handed to him.