I'm pretty sure you must be a raging homosexual then.Tsakali wrote:I'm pretty sure that chick has a penis.
Pretty sure though.
I'm pretty sure you must be a raging homosexual then.Tsakali wrote:I'm pretty sure that chick has a penis.
ffs dude...I thought I saved everyone on the forum the time, money and trouble of watching that POS.Memphis wrote:total recall. why the fuck was it even called total recall? it had nine tenths of fuck to do with it, unless they really weren't able to come up with new names for quaid, rekall and a few other throwaway pointless references, after stripping all the actual good bits of the original before coughing up this wet hankie full of stomach gunk. 3.
Shawshank grossed loads.xer0s wrote:Shawshank Redemption
lol, what? No...Plan B wrote:Shawshank grossed loads.xer0s wrote:Shawshank Redemption
yeah, not so much. imdb says it had a $25M budget and made $28.3M in the US, $58.5 worldwide. Mission Impossible (1996), for comparison, cost $80M and grossed $180M USA/$457M world.Plan B wrote:Shawshank grossed loads.xer0s wrote:Shawshank Redemption
Thought it was a yank remake of that Korean monster flick.GONNAFISTYA wrote:The Host
lol I didn't know that. Now it all makes perfect sense.Plan B wrote:But yeah, "from the author of The Twilight Saga".
I saw the trailer with the sound off once and thought it looked like it would be as cool sci-fi as Oblivion or Elysium (sorta the same production design...sorta) but it was horrible, just horrible. At least I could jump through the scenes I knew would suck.Plan B wrote:Why do you even bother with this crapola?