Page 42 of 284
Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2006 12:36 pm
by Dave
Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2006 1:05 pm
by busetibi
FanaticX wrote:Shots of the sky and clouds from a while back.
love your work :icon14:
:props:
Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2006 1:10 pm
by Doombrain
Going for a meal at that hotel that looks like a sail soon.
There’s a ranking system here that works on your number plate, the less digits you have on the plate, the more important you are. Mental money out here. I've been waiting for ages to shoot it.
Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 12:03 am
by R00k
Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 12:24 am
by saturn
Those pics give me warm feeling, Rook

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 12:10 pm
by Doombrain
GAY WOOD

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 12:19 pm
by mac
so youre chasing kids trough the woods huh :icon25:
Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 12:20 pm
by Doombrain
oh. ha x3
Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 1:31 pm
by FanaticX
That photo has got potential, DB.
ROOk, nice set of vacation images. Wish I could go diving right now...
Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 1:50 pm
by FanaticX
I didn't ask permission...
..and if you like it please don't ask me to p.p. a larger version because my comp is slow as shit as it is with the small image...
As I said, it's got potential..

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 6:22 pm
by Don Carlos
So you edit all yours pics FX?
Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 6:54 pm
by FanaticX
Yes, every single one. Some more than others...
Why?
Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 6:57 pm
by Don Carlos
Just wondering...
You use Photoshop? I might try and make some of my pics look better with a bit of fancy editing

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 7:34 pm
by R00k
PS is a must when it comes to digital photos. Even my crappy ones above are touched up and polished to the extent of my limited experience.

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 7:37 pm
by R00k
saturn wrote:Those pics give me warm feeling, Rook

I almost thought you were being facetious, with the wording. Darn Engrish.
But yea, 8 days in the islands without a care in the world is what produced those photos, so it's kinda cool that it carried through in a way.

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 7:39 pm
by R00k
FanaticX wrote:ROOk, nice set of vacation images. Wish I could go diving right now...
Thanks. If you ever get a chance to go diving in St. John in the VI, don't think twice. It's unbelievable.
edit: being a diver, do you have any underwater pics? Or do you not have the gear?
I wish there were some of those in here.
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 1:48 am
by mac
FanaticX wrote:I didn't ask permission...
..and if you like it please don't ask me to p.p. a larger version because my comp is slow as shit as it is with the small image...
As I said, it's got potential..
wow looking at the two versions... what a difference..
fanaticX do you have a custom script for youre b/w convertion
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 5:44 am
by Doombrain
Cheers X. I've already don't a BW on a red filter, didn't think to post it though.
my normal BWs are from citys.
I still havn't managed to get out and about in dubai yet, i'll be kicking myself it i don't do it soon.
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 7:24 am
by Dave
I will play this game \o/

Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 10:27 am
by MKJ
i like the sepia better
sorry daev

Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 10:42 am
by SplishSplash
the thing is dave's just looks like a straight bw conversion while fanx obviously fucked around with dodge and burn or something similar
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 10:53 am
by brisk
Yeah, but who gives a shit really? I care about the image, not the process.
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 10:54 am
by MKJ
no u
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 10:54 am
by Dave
Mine is a little more than a straight B&W conversion... Monochrome channel mixer layer set to 72,42,20,-20, duplicate the background and applied diffuse glow to it, set the blending option to multiply and fill of the duplicate layer to 51%, dodged the bg layer from top to bottom to bring out the glow, kids and the trail and applied curves to enhance the contrast between the center and outsides.
But, you can't tell mine has been fucked around with.. that's the whole idea

Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 10:58 am
by MKJ
i think it could use a higher whitebalance, no?