Page 5 of 16
Re: mars landing
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 2:12 am
by Tsakali
ah ok, both situations are not mutually exclusive, I guess it can choose to capacitate during the night, but they could just as easily use it.
so I guess the bite size feeding of information the media loves so much , creates situations to where information can be misunderstood.
Re: mars landing
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 2:31 am
by Tsakali
color picture!
I wonder if it's post filtered.
yeah it prolly is, but so much easier on the eyes
Re: mars landing
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 2:46 am
by andyman
Tsakali wrote:ah ok, both situations are not mutually exclusive, I guess it can choose to capacitate during the night, but they could just as easily use it.
so I guess the bite size feeding of information the media loves so much , creates situations to where information can be misunderstood.
they also said that the charging at night creates heat that is used to keep the instruments warm and they have a thermocoupler on there too, so that makes it more efficient, etc.
there's another press conference tomorrow around 12pm pacific time
Re: mars landing
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 2:51 am
by mrd
Awesome photo.. damn this is exciting shit

Re: mars landing
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 5:06 am
by Tsakali
now THIS is how trolling is done !

Re: mars landing
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 6:10 am
by Whiskey 7
mrd wrote:Awesome photo.. damn this is exciting shit

Yes I find it as exciting as that a Moon landing

Wonder how many here were born after '69?
Those final moments, sky crane, lowering a small car sized 'rover' so far away bought

to my eyes.
Imagine, some of you people, immortality (another topic) aside, might live to see a similar landing on the moons of Jupiter, even a far off world?
Thought, what if a similar (now read alien) object landed here and started to explore on its own accord, oblivious to us is you like
Inhabited or not, we are just another sphere in the universe.
Now that's heavy & deep

Re: mars landing
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 6:59 am
by Tsakali
In my lifetime, i'd be happy if they could pull off an affordable price ticket to orbit the earth once.
Re: mars landing
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 7:03 am
by Whiskey 7
Tsakali wrote:In my lifetime, i'd be happy if they could pull off an affordable price ticket to orbit the earth once.
I suspect they will

Re: mars landing
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 7:50 am
by Eraser
If you've got 100 grand lying around then you already can.
Re: mars landing
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 7:56 am
by Tsakali
you sum kind of rich moron? I said affordable
Re: mars landing
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 8:03 am
by Eraser
Not me, but I guess it depends on what you consider to be affordable ey?
Re: mars landing
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 8:23 am
by Captain
Yeah, your mom for example. BAM!
Re: mars landing
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 8:24 am
by Tsakali
Eraser wrote:Not me, but I guess it depends on what you consider to be affordable ey?
not really a simple answer...it should be a combination of one's income and the level of importance one places on an opportunity like that. Some of us would save for years, while others couldn't be bothered unless it was as cheap as a 3 day cruise to some dump in mexico. I'd pay 5-10 grand for a sit before I'd have to reevaluate my enthusiasm on the issue.
What would you pay realistically?
Re: mars landing
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 8:31 am
by Eraser
lol, did Geoff post this?
Do you think it's just a cooincidence that the Mars rover expedition is happening just as the movie Total Recall is coming to movie theaters? Do those Mars pictures remind you a little bit of desert Earth photographs? That's because they're being taken in ARIZONA, at a repurposed military installation. There is some serious money changing hands here and the government will do almost anything to keep you from finding out about it. In many ways, faking this expedition is way, way easier than it was during the Apollo years, due to no astronauts on the mission, comparable gravity, and atmosphere.
http://news.slashdot.org/comments.pl?si ... d=40898761
Re: mars landing
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 8:38 am
by Eraser
Tsakali wrote:What would you pay realistically?
I dunno. I guess I'd be willing to spend a couple of thousand dollar on a few hours in space. It would be absolutely awesome to experience, but I guess that for that same amount of money, I could also spend a few weeks in some far away country where I could experience all kinds of things I've never experienced before either. So it's a bit hard to say.
Re: mars landing
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 11:24 am
by seremtan
Eraser wrote:lol, did Geoff post this?
Do you think it's just a cooincidence that the Mars rover expedition is happening just as the movie Total Recall is coming to movie theaters? Do those Mars pictures remind you a little bit of desert Earth photographs? That's because they're being taken in ARIZONA, at a repurposed military installation. There is some serious money changing hands here and the government will do almost anything to keep you from finding out about it. In many ways, faking this expedition is way, way easier than it was during the Apollo years, due to no astronauts on the mission, comparable gravity, and atmosphere.
http://news.slashdot.org/comments.pl?si ... d=40898761
trouble with the internet is, it's hard to tell who's a trolling moron and who's just a moron
Re: mars landing
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 12:04 pm
by xer0s
That's true...
Re: mars landing
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 12:24 pm
by Eraser
xer0s wrote:That's true...
Well, in your case it isn't
Re: mars landing
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 12:25 pm
by +JuggerNaut+
Captain Mazda wrote:Yeah, your mom for example. BAM!

Re: mars landing
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 3:53 pm
by Doombrain
[lvlshot]http://www.nasa.gov/images/content/674083main_PIA15691-full_full.jpg[/lvlshot]
Re: mars landing
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 5:11 pm
by seremtan
looks like it landed in sydney during bush fire season
Re: mars landing
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 5:38 pm
by obsidian
It's a desert with a thin atmosphere, so you can't expect the most amazing of scenery. Besides, I believe it's taking photos more or less autonomously with one of the orientational cameras at this point so it's going to have problems framing the best shot with its basic sensor. I believe the photographic mast which the primary optical cameras are attached to hasn't been extended yet.
Re: mars landing
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 6:37 pm
by xer0s
I need to tilt my head. Oh wait, no I don't...
Re: mars landing
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 6:59 pm
by seremtan
yeah you do. Mars is on a slope
Re: mars landing
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 7:07 pm
by xer0s
srsly?