Quake3World

Posted: **Wed Mar 30, 2005 2:27 pm**

fuck u...

Posted: **Wed Mar 30, 2005 2:31 pm**

no u....

crushed...

Posted: **Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:09 pm**

LXS wrote:Doom3, a generally very average shooter with a nice engine, was utterly stomped upon by Halflife 2, in terms of gameplay, AI, storyline and atmosphere. 90% of the time, HL2 looks better than Doom3 aswell.

HL2 > D3.

End of story...

lol hl2 was one of the most boring games I've ever played...I'd rather stomp on hell hordes than shoot bugs from start to finish with a few scenes here and there barely worth my time...u kids play video games right?

geez...

Posted: **Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:12 pm**

o'dium wrote:And, when id brought doom 3 out last year, there were still people kidding themselves into thinking they could play it on a 1ghz machine with 256ram and a GF4. *BZZZZZZZT*.

lol...if you can't play DOOM 3 with a system like this then you're a moron...I get 30+ steady fps on my mom's P3 800...real men always find a way...

Posted: **Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:13 pm**

Freakaloin wrote:whatever..i could walk right up to them with a soda can and be immune from pain...did u try it? i became a combine to them i guess...

are you serious?

omfg we're talking about a huge bug in a game that's supposedly the best game ever...hmmm

Posted: **Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:14 pm**

Grudge wrote:HL2 is a better game. Simple as that. It took 6 fucking years to develop too, so I would have been pissed if it wasn't.

...do you believe everything you read on gaming mags?

most of the reviewers don't play video games...

Posted: **Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:14 pm**

Duhard wrote:
o'dium wrote:And, when id brought doom 3 out last year, there were still people kidding themselves into thinking they could play it on a 1ghz machine with 256ram and a GF4. *BZZZZZZZT*.
lol...if you can't play DOOM 3 with a system like this then you're a moron...I get 30+ steady fps on my mom's P3 800...real men always find a way...

thats true. i played it on a 1.2ghz with 768 sdram (not ddr :A ) and a geforce3ti2, and got more than steady fps
not all of us need 2048x2048 textures and 18 shadows per model

i played the demo a few weeks back when i got my new powerhouse and while it looked a lot better. it still sucked

Posted: **Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:18 pm**

4days wrote:chronicles of riddick was better than either of them.

...because chuck osborn from pc gamer uk2k4 said so?

I cancelled my subscription when my free "Ultimate Shooter's Guide" claimed hl2 as "the greatest game ever made" with a score of 98%

you guys need to understand taht video games reviews on gaming mags are pointless...jesus

at least I got a free issue out of that subscription...

Posted: **Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:20 pm**

MKJ wrote:
Duhard wrote:
o'dium wrote:And, when id brought doom 3 out last year, there were still people kidding themselves into thinking they could play it on a 1ghz machine with 256ram and a GF4. *BZZZZZZZT*.
lol...if you can't play DOOM 3 with a system like this then you're a moron...I get 30+ steady fps on my mom's P3 800...real men always find a way...
thats true. i played it on a 1.2ghz with 768 sdram (not ddr :A ) and a geforce3ti2, and got more than steady fps
not all of us need 2048x2048 textures and 18 shadows per model

i played the demo a few weeks back when i got my new powerhouse and while it looked a lot better. it still sucked

My mom's pc is a P3 800 with 256 SDRAM and a shitty GeForce 2 GTS 32 Mb...the game runs fine.

true story...

Posted: **Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:33 pm**

...why buy a new rig when your old amd k6-2 can run the game just fine?

sounds like some conspiracy to me...don't waste your money kids.

Posted: **Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:46 pm**

Duhard wrote:
Grudge wrote:HL2 is a better game. Simple as that. It took 6 fucking years to develop too, so I would have been pissed if it wasn't.
...do you believe everything you read on gaming mags?

most of the reviewers don't play video games...

what? I don't read gaming mags

Posted: **Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:48 pm**

Grudge wrote:
Duhard wrote:
Grudge wrote:HL2 is a better game. Simple as that. It took 6 fucking years to develop too, so I would have been pissed if it wasn't.
...do you believe everything you read on gaming mags?

most of the reviewers don't play video games...
what? I don't read gaming mags

a homo says what?

Posted: **Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:52 pm**

Duhard wrote:
4days wrote:chronicles of riddick was better than either of them.
...because chuck osborn from pc gamer uk2k4 said so?

I cancelled my subscription when my free "Ultimate Shooter's Guide" claimed hl2 as "the greatest game ever made" with a score of 98%

you guys need to understand taht video games reviews on gaming mags are pointless...jesus

at least I got a free issue out of that subscription...

who?

because it was fun, a bit innovative and i played it all the way through.

Posted: **Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:53 pm**

...so hl2 is great because it took 6 years to develop?

Posted: **Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:54 pm**

...yeah.

AFAIK it was in development after the first HL was released

Posted: **Wed Mar 30, 2005 4:01 pm**

The HavoX wrote:...yeah.

AFAIK it was in development after the first HL was released

go away...

Posted: **Wed Mar 30, 2005 4:07 pm**

Hey kids... this is why HL2's AI is the buggiest shit ever. Goof was spot on.

http://www.nofrag.com/fichiers/halflife2/videos/937/

Posted: **Wed Mar 30, 2005 4:08 pm**

i love when 30 mb files download in a few seconds...

Posted: **Wed Mar 30, 2005 4:12 pm**

dzjepp wrote:Hey kids... this is why HL2's AI is the buggiest shit ever. Goof was spot on.

http://www.nofrag.com/fichiers/halflife2/videos/937/

hmmm french article...

Posted: **Wed Mar 30, 2005 4:13 pm**

It's a download not article your 22' guns are blocking the monitor

Posted: **Wed Mar 30, 2005 4:15 pm**

lol..nice ai...i actually did the same thing shooting those combines as they walked to the window...the ai killed the game for me...along with the stuttering problem and horrible load times...some fixed now but now its too late...

Posted: **Wed Mar 30, 2005 4:18 pm**

dzjepp wrote:It's a download not article your 22' guns are blocking the monitor

jesus...those retards from France sure are pathetic...we don't speak nerdy like this here in quebec...

I guess surrendering for 2000 years fucks up your language...

Posted: **Wed Mar 30, 2005 4:33 pm**

2 hours?
i actually got bored with D3's repetitive gameplay in like 20 minutes....
walk into dark room, kill monsters, get items, expect atleast one monster to pop out at you somewhere, go to next dark room. Repeat.
And then the whole game: find card key, go to next level. Repeat.

Posted: **Wed Mar 30, 2005 4:35 pm**

stocktroll wrote:2 hours?
i actually got bored with D3's repetitive gameplay in like 20 minutes....
walk into dark room, kill monsters, get items, expect atleast one monster to pop out at you somewhere, go to next dark room. Repeat.
And then the whole game: find card key, go to next level. Repeat.

if killing bugs is your thing...go for it

Posted: **Wed Mar 30, 2005 7:06 pm**

stocktroll wrote:2 hours?
i actually got bored with D3's repetitive gameplay in like 20 minutes....
walk into dark room, kill monsters, get items, expect atleast one monster to pop out at you somewhere, go to next dark room. Repeat.
And then the whole game: find card key, go to next level. Repeat.

You realize thats exactly what it was intended to be right? It wasn't intended to be new or innovative, it was just a graphically superior version of the original. I quite enjoyed it. That said, HL2 (excluding the ending) was also a great FPS.

Quake3World

DOOM 3 expansion pack will include ctf..omfg (56K destroyer)