Quake3World

Posted: **Tue Jun 13, 2006 12:41 am**

I'll be back during the first intermission

Posted: **Tue Jun 13, 2006 12:41 am**

they better cap on this PP. :E

Posted: **Tue Jun 13, 2006 1:00 am**

MARKKANEEEENNN!!!!

Posted: **Tue Jun 13, 2006 1:06 am**

Wow, first time I ever agree with Don Cherry. He's ranting about Hemsky's invisible shots.

Posted: **Tue Jun 13, 2006 1:07 am**

Hemsky needs to grow a nut. he passed up plenty. contributing factor to the 0 for 16 PP. pathetic.

Posted: **Tue Jun 13, 2006 1:08 am**

HIGHLY entertaining game

Posted: **Tue Jun 13, 2006 1:10 am**

ZERO FOR SIXTEEN FFS

Posted: **Tue Jun 13, 2006 1:20 am**

Markennen lucked out on that PP.

Posted: **Tue Jun 13, 2006 1:27 am**

and the next PP he totally owns it lol good show

Posted: **Tue Jun 13, 2006 1:52 am**

i have to say...that tripping call was bad

Posted: **Tue Jun 13, 2006 2:02 am**

Heh

But this is Game 2 all over again! Markkanen is working his ass off and not getting any support, ffs

Posted: **Tue Jun 13, 2006 2:55 am**

2-1 Carolina

Posted: **Tue Jun 13, 2006 2:58 am**

well..

not good enough.

the physical play disappeared halfway through the second, the Cane's PP was quite good while Ed's was pathetic, and the Cane's D was again, awesome. not talking about Ward, he wasn't tested at all, but the blocked shots were insane just as they have been from game 1.

not looking good, folks.

Posted: **Tue Jun 13, 2006 3:04 am**

now what kind of hockey fan would you be if you think edmonton cant come back from some measley 3-1 series?

NOT MUCH I TELL YOU!

Posted: **Tue Jun 13, 2006 3:07 am**

Trust me Shadd, I'd want nothing more. Logically though, it's not going to happen. It's just like saying "what kind of hockey fan would you be if you didn't think Pittsburgh would win the Cup next year?"

Posted: **Tue Jun 13, 2006 3:11 am**

shadd_ wrote:

now what kind of hockey fan would you be if you think edmonton cant come back from some measley 3-1 series?

NOT MUCH I TELL YOU!

for an American, i'm a huge fan

really though, if it were my team i'd be more optimistic.

Posted: **Tue Jun 13, 2006 3:11 am**

BLASHEMER!

i hear ya though. but if you look back through playoff history its been done many times before. fuck, teams have come back from 3-0.

Posted: **Tue Jun 13, 2006 3:52 am**

Yep, but that was in the topsy-turvy olden days when morale and home ice didn't matter too much. It's a totally different game now and all odds are against Edmonton

Disappointment to say the least.

Posted: **Tue Jun 13, 2006 11:33 am**

There were some fucking splendid hits in that first period.
GG 'CANES!

Posted: **Tue Jun 13, 2006 1:20 pm**

Nightshade wrote:There were some fucking splendid hits in that first period.
GG 'CANES!

pfft

Posted: **Tue Jun 13, 2006 6:04 pm**

Nightshade wrote:There were some fucking splendid hits in that first period.
GG 'CANES!

ffs

Posted: **Wed Jun 14, 2006 10:13 am**

go Caaaaaaaanes

Sorry, I just don't like Edmonton. Damn overachievers -_-

Actually it's good see all these 'small-market' teams do better. I just want Wesley and Weight and the others to win it. I'm sappy like that. If the Oilers aren't gonna help their goalie out, as much as I like seeing awesome saves, it's not easy to root for them.

Posted: **Wed Jun 14, 2006 11:44 am**

+JuggerNaut+ wrote:
Nightshade wrote:There were some fucking splendid hits in that first period.
GG 'CANES!
pfft

lol, hater.

Posted: **Wed Jun 14, 2006 12:04 pm**

actually i like Brind'Amour and Recchi, but i side a little more for Ed. I just wanted to see a good, LONG series, but it's not happening.

Posted: **Wed Jun 14, 2006 2:35 pm**

Oh, you never know...

Quake3World

2006 Stanley Cup Finals