Tapatalk

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
Post Reply
Deathshroud
Posts: 2103
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 6:22 pm

Tapatalk

Post by Deathshroud »

So, is there any reason why this forum isn't registered on tapatalk?
EtUL
Posts: 3307
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2001 7:00 am

Re: Tapatalk

Post by EtUL »

i looked up tapatalk because some other forum kept bugging me about it and it does weird shit like run all traffic thru them.

also the administration doesn't care about this place cause there's like 20 of us.
User avatar
MKJ
Posts: 32582
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Tapatalk

Post by MKJ »

Yes, its not a matter of simply installing an app.
We're better off with a mobile css anyway. Obviously that requires some effort from DooMer.
User avatar
Eraser
Posts: 19183
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Tapatalk

Post by Eraser »

MKJ wrote:effort
MKJ wrote:DooMer.
:olo:
U4EA
Posts: 2894
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Tapatalk

Post by U4EA »

The regular site already works fine on any recent smartphone .. ?!?!
Mogul
Posts: 1635
Joined: Wed May 23, 1973 12:48 pm

Re: Tapatalk

Post by Mogul »

I use Tapatalk for a couple of other forums and it is a much higher-quality experience than merely browsing the normal site on a mobile phone. I highly recommend getting this forum on Tapatalk.
This line only remake is total rubbish I've ever seen!!! Fuck off!!! --CZghost
Tsakali
Posts: 7175
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Tapatalk

Post by Tsakali »

U4EA wrote:The regular site already works fine on any recent smartphone .. ?!?!
on an android, when you zoom in, you can have it to where you can read the replies but you'll have to scroll sideways to see the col. that houses the posters info...and there is some humor points to that as you can pretty much guess most of the time who it is whithout scrolling... font colors help though.


So even though, it's 'ok' it could be much better.
Dark Metal
Posts: 5496
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Tapatalk

Post by Dark Metal »

Eraser wrote:
MKJ wrote:effort
MKJ wrote:DooMer.
:olo:
I also blue smiley faced.
[WYD]
Big Kahuna Burger
Posts: 2458
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 6:56 pm

Re: Tapatalk

Post by Big Kahuna Burger »

Eraser wrote:
MKJ wrote:effort
MKJ wrote:DooMer.
:olo:
some people work 40 hours a week. also, pretty sure I posted a link to a phpbb plugin that renders the site for a mobile view in irc like 40 years ago.
User avatar
Whiskey 7
Posts: 9712
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2001 7:00 am

Re: Tapatalk

Post by Whiskey 7 »

Deathshroud wrote:So, is there any reason why this forum isn't registered on tapatalk?

Tapatalk?

googles.... Oh an app for a smartphone :smirk:

I might have to update my brick


Image
User avatar
MKJ
Posts: 32582
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Tapatalk

Post by MKJ »

Tsakali wrote: on an android, when you zoom in, you can have it to where you can read the replies but you'll have to scroll sideways to see the col. that houses the posters info...and there is some humor points to that as you can pretty much guess most of the time who it is whithout scrolling... font colors help though.


So even though, it's 'ok' it could be much better.
yes. the reply box also doesnt quite fit nor works very well.
its also slow as fuck :up:
User avatar
Eraser
Posts: 19183
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Tapatalk

Post by Eraser »

Big Kahuna Burger wrote:some people work 40 hours a week.
Yes. Some people. People like me.
Ryoki
Posts: 13460
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2001 7:00 am

Re: Tapatalk

Post by Ryoki »

Worked 40 hours a week for years, now 36 hours, which is considered full time here. It's pretty awesome and i wouldn't want to go back to 40, fuck no :up:
[size=85][color=#0080BF]io chiamo pinguini![/color][/size]
User avatar
Whiskey 7
Posts: 9712
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2001 7:00 am

Re: Tapatalk

Post by Whiskey 7 »

Ryoki wrote:Worked 40 hours a week for years, now 36 hours, which is considered full time here. It's pretty awesome and i wouldn't want to go back to 40, fuck no :up:
Believe I work 36.25 hours but as flextime.
Don't know if you people have it in your workplace, if you work :smirk: for a living but with flextime I am able to save time every day up to an hour or so and have a day off every 2 weeks (as I please with higher appoval - they don't often say no)
It works both ways but the boss/Manager/Team Leader really like to have all bums on seats every day.


Note: I did say bums :olo:

OT: Still thinking ... will I buy one of these smart phones soon?
Deathshroud
Posts: 2103
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 6:22 pm

Re: Tapatalk

Post by Deathshroud »

Mogul wrote:I use Tapatalk for a couple of other forums and it is a much higher-quality experience than merely browsing the normal site on a mobile phone. I highly recommend getting this forum on Tapatalk.
This is what I'm sayin
User avatar
Eraser
Posts: 19183
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Tapatalk

Post by Eraser »

Just downloaded the Chrome beta for ICS (Android 4). It's truly great. Much faster than the default browser. It also sizes Q3W very nicely in both portrait and landscape orientation. It shows the bar with usernames/icons together with post contents with text being very well readable.
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Re: Tapatalk

Post by Doombrain »

Eraser wrote:Just downloaded the Chrome beta for ICS (Android 4). It's truly great. Much faster than the default browser. It also sizes Q3W very nicely in both portrait and landscape orientation. It shows the bar with usernames/icons together with post contents with text being very well readable.
Does flash work for you?
User avatar
Eraser
Posts: 19183
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Tapatalk

Post by Eraser »

I'm not sure. YouTube works but that's probably using HTML5 for the mobile site. I did get a warning on some random site that I didn't have flash player 7 installed, so I guess it doesn't work. But if I really need flash I can always switch to the Android browser.
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Re: Tapatalk

Post by Doombrain »

Only ask because i run my xoom on ICS but used an image from the US so thought it might be a local thing. I guess it'll be added when the beta ends.
U4EA
Posts: 2894
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Tapatalk

Post by U4EA »

Chrome Beta doesn't support flash, it's one of the most common complaints in its review section on the Play Store. At this point I don't think they'll be adding flash support any time soon:

http://www.iontab.com/news/chrome-for-a ... -beta-soon
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Re: Tapatalk

Post by Doombrain »

ah, handy. anyway the stock ICS browser seems quicker.
Post Reply