They know it.

Post by **Massive Quasars** » Sat Apr 09, 2005 6:08 am

In the UK:
http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns? ... 624944.900

Looks like a good idea, only thing I don't like is that you must give a sample whether or not you've gone to trial or been charged.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Sat Apr 09, 2005 6:55 am

I think it's fucked up. It's an invasion of privacy.

Post by **Massive Quasars** » Sat Apr 09, 2005 7:05 am

I think it's great, just overreaching a bit too much. If someone is charged and convicted for a crime, they should have to submit a sample. Otherwise, no.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Sat Apr 09, 2005 7:14 am

I agree there. Only if convicted. Otherwise that's like asking for your figerprints or personal information for no reason.