Lol you fags with your expensive thin monitors. HAY I SPENT 300 DOLLARS ON A MONITOR SO NOW I CAN LAUGH AT IDIOTS WHO BUY CRTS THAT DO THE EXACT SAME SHIT FOR LESS THAN HALF THE PRICE. I'M SO MUCH SMARTER THAN THEM. RITE? RITE?
eepberries wrote:Lol you fags with your expensive thin monitors. HAY I SPENT 300 DOLLARS ON A MONITOR SO NOW I CAN LAUGH AT IDIOTS WHO BUY CRTS THAT DO THE EXACT SAME SHIT FOR LESS THAN HALF THE PRICE. I'M SO MUCH SMARTER THAN THEM. RITE? RITE?
eepberries wrote:Lol you fags with your expensive thin monitors. HAY I SPENT 300 DOLLARS ON A MONITOR SO NOW I CAN LAUGH AT IDIOTS WHO BUY CRTS THAT DO THE EXACT SAME SHIT FOR LESS THAN HALF THE PRICE. I'M SO MUCH SMARTER THAN THEM. RITE? RITE?
hey, you're stupid
How? I pay half as much for a monitor that does the same thing as yours :icon26:
Psyche911 wrote:Just because you can't tell the difference doesn't mean they are the same. Monitors have a range in price for a reason. Just like everything else...
Yeah, isn't about the only difference that these LCD monitors are more expensive to make?
Size. A CRT is about 10 times as deep as an LCD. Weight, an LCD is very light, unlike my 19" CRT which weighs about 50 pounds. Power consumption; Current LCDs conserve a fair amount more electricity, and future ones (oLEDs, etc) offer to improve that quite a bit. Some people also find reading text on LCDs easier on the eyes.
I still have a CRT, and I'm gonna stick with it until it dies because it offers a great picture. But the convenience of an LCD is a huge selling point.
