Can't it be both?

My point isn't that she's sick. My point is that she's corrupt and will lie about anything and cover up the truth as she sees fit no matter how illegal it is. Also the story about her IT guy is breaking in mainstream news now.

psst, movies aren't real

Funny way of making your point, by not mentioning it at all when you went down your pneumonia rabbit hole. In fact, this is the first time you've mentioned her being corrupt in this thread. Everything else you've said was about her health, except one comment on page 2 about accountability. Sounds more like you're trying to distance yourself from your ridiculous intardnet-fueled conspiracy theory about her doctor doing an impromptu motor neuron disease test at the side of a curb. Feel free to refute my response on page 7 whenever you like, though. After all, for your point about her lying to be valid, her pneumonia claim has to be false, right?

I'm repeating myself but as I said, I don't think they were testing for a motor neuron disease, they were just testing for symptoms. A weak grip could signify something to the nurse. And yes, I think she's lying about the pneumonia, same as she lied about the emails.

6th pic down for the test she's conducting here. https://informatics.med.nyu.edu/modules ... motor.html

That test requires checking both hands at the same time. Plus the doctor holds their hands above the patient's with the intent to pull up while the patient pulls down. The picture you posted and the link you gave don't share any similarities. The hand orientation and posture of the doctor and Clinton are in no way similar to the gestures used to conduct the test. The whole point of doing that particular test is to see if there's a difference in grip strength between both hands, so how is Clinton's doctor doing the test with just one hand? You would know this if you had read the text in your own link. Your entire theory is based on a test that's not being performed. The simple explanation is pneumonia, and you're delusional if you think a MND is more reasonable. Telling me I'm the one jumping to conclusions is pretty much the textbook definition of projection.

hay guise we made a video urging you to vote for Shillary with a bunch of famous people so you'll watch it like the dumb schmucks you are, but then to flatter your """intelligence""" we'll acknowledge the obvious artifice upfront in the hope that you'll see this admission itself as a kind of authenticity; and furthermore we're hoping that this bullshit-as-sincerity dynamic transfers over to the actual vote in November, so you'll overlook the glaring deficiencies of the candidate and vote for Shillary in a manner both ironic, and yet on some level you can't explain, heartfelt.

oh, and something about your family, community, America etc. VOTE SHILLARY

That's an odd way to hold someones hand isn't it? Not so odd when you're performing a motor neuron test to see if a patient is having issues though. Oh and coincidentally, that's her nurse. Odd test for Pneumonia. She was given this test shortly before her collapse.

edit: 6th pic down for the test she's conducting here. https://informatics.med.nyu.edu/modules ... motor.html

so whats your take on the email scandal transient?

I think it shows a high degree of technical incompetence on her part. It was a totally avoidable problem, were it not for her mistrust and guarded nature. I don't think it was done maliciously in order to hide shady dealings, but the fact that she wanted to be off the record from her peers in office is bad enough. It makes me wonder what else she's doing in secret.

It's a good thing everyone's so focused on this instead of her countless violations of human rights and international law.

It's a good thing everyone's so focused on this instead of her countless violations of human rights and international law.

Watch John Oliver and he'll put the email and Clinton foundation scandals compared to Trump's shitstorm into perspective...

This one?