Quake3World.com Forums
     General Discussion
        US court rules that p2p programs are illegal


Post new topicReply to topic
Login | Profile | | FAQ | Search | IRC




Previous topic | Next topic 
Topic Starter Topic: US court rules that p2p programs are illegal

Cool #9
Cool #9
Joined: 01 Dec 2000
Posts: 44139
PostPosted: 06-28-2005 02:54 AM           Profile   Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


I haven't got an english source for this, but for the dutchies, I got it from here:
http://www.nu.nl/news/547688/54/%27Inte ... jk%27.html

Basically they said that authors of p2p programs and those that distribute the programs (with illegal intentions) are responsible.

Not sure how water tight this is, since it's pretty much impossible that someone's intentions were illegal (see BitTorrent for example, his intentions were clearly not illegal) but Kazaa or Direct Connect could say the same.




Top
                 

Tap, Nap, or Snap
Tap, Nap, or Snap
Joined: 01 Dec 2000
Posts: 27667
PostPosted: 06-28-2005 02:57 AM           Profile   Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


The interpretation of the ruling that I heard said that P2P software companies can be sued if the users commit acts of copyright infringement, not that the programs were illegal. I think that it will be hard to win a lawsuit of this type, as intent is very hard to prove and there are legit uses for P2P.




Top
                 

Karot!
Karot!
Joined: 31 Jul 2001
Posts: 19348
PostPosted: 06-28-2005 02:57 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


Seems to me like blaming the creators of a browser for the fact that illegal sites can be reached. Or is that a bad comparison?



_________________
io chiamo pinguini!


Top
                 

Privates Investigator
Privates Investigator
Joined: 15 Jan 2000
Posts: 31412
PostPosted: 06-28-2005 03:01 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


the supreme court made a lot of retarded decisions in the past week or so




Top
                 

Tap, Nap, or Snap
Tap, Nap, or Snap
Joined: 01 Dec 2000
Posts: 27667
PostPosted: 06-28-2005 03:03 AM           Profile   Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


I don't think so. Look at it like this: Guns are made to kill things, but that doesn't mean that the gun manufacturer knows that all their guns will be used to commit murder. A handgun is really only good for killing humans, but that doesn't mean that they'll always be used to commit murder.

A coarse analogy, to be sure, but I think it holds in this context.

edit: DOH! postus interruptus!




Top
                 

Banned
Banned
Joined: 02 May 2000
Posts: 12808
PostPosted: 06-28-2005 03:05 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


Ryoki wrote:
Seems to me like blaming the creators of a browser for the fact that illegal sites can be reached. Or is that a bad comparison?


Nah that's a solid enough analogy.



_________________
Image


Top
                 

Privates Investigator
Privates Investigator
Joined: 15 Jan 2000
Posts: 31412
PostPosted: 06-28-2005 03:14 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


In the past week:
- Your home can be seized to build a Walmart
- RIAA/MPAA have another scapegoat in the music war, which will extend the culture of lawsuit and probably not bring us any closer to fairly priced media
- Separation of church and state can be circumvented by claiming you're paying historical homage

We're on the verge of finding out what happens when a country over-legislates itself




Top
                 

Messatsu Ko Jy-ouu
Messatsu Ko Jy-ouu
Joined: 24 Nov 2000
Posts: 44139
PostPosted: 06-28-2005 03:17 AM           Profile   Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


water tight? not even close.
"for illegal intentions". is kazaa for illegal intentions? not really, you can share livesets n the like if you want.

oh wait i see ryoki already covered all this shiat. owned then
US court can suck it



_________________
Image


Top
                 

Banned
Banned
Joined: 02 May 2000
Posts: 12808
PostPosted: 06-28-2005 03:20 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


I'd argue that Kazaa was fully about illegal file sharing, that it happened to have legal uses too is just a matter of coincidence.

It'd be hard to convincingly argue that point with regards to it's intended use though.



_________________
Image


Top
                 

Etile
Etile
Joined: 19 Nov 2003
Posts: 34899
PostPosted: 06-28-2005 04:30 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


Ryoki wrote:
Seems to me like blaming the creators of a browser for the fact that illegal sites can be reached. Or is that a bad comparison?


nope, sounds fine :icon14:

or even: cars are involved in hit-and-runs in which people are killed, therefore car manufacturers should be held partially liable for their deaths :dork:

presumably if i stab someone with a kitchen knife, it'll be Zanussi or Coalport in the dock with me...

US Supreme Court :lol:




Top
                 

Eh?
Eh?
Joined: 25 Mar 2001
Posts: 32049
PostPosted: 06-28-2005 05:33 AM           Profile   Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


Gotta love "smart people" thinking this shit up...




Top
                 

He's Super
He's Super
Joined: 08 Sep 2001
Posts: 11253
PostPosted: 06-28-2005 05:42 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


The thing is, what you have to understand is that something drastic needs to be done. While everyone here may like to download stuff and your own personal downloads probably have no impact whatsoever on the market, multiply that by at least 5 million and you can see the impact it starts to have.

Cinema takings are well down this year. The music industry is saying that profits are at an all time low. Game companies are going bankrupt because of poor sales.

Now you may have no sympathy for these people, because they are ultimately richer than you, but it was only a matter of time before something big came into play to try and stop the sheer amount of piracy that is taking place now. It's out of control. Literally everyone I know has bought pirate DVD's over the past year. This was only to be expected when broadband was introduced and couple that with CD Writers and now DVD writers, it was completely fucking obvious where this was all heading, and part of me thinks "well, fucking blame Sony for making CD Writers. What the hell did you think people were going to use a PC with broadband internet and a CD writer for????"




Top
                 

Cool #9
Cool #9
Joined: 01 Dec 2000
Posts: 44139
PostPosted: 06-28-2005 05:52 AM           Profile   Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


The problem is that the music industry's sales aren't down.
In the years they sued napster, they claimed sales went down while in fact they made more money than the year before. They're just big fat liars and their methods of getting "their" money are in some cases unacceptable.




Top
                 

Tap, Nap, or Snap
Tap, Nap, or Snap
Joined: 01 Dec 2000
Posts: 27667
PostPosted: 06-28-2005 06:26 AM           Profile   Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


I have no sympathy for the MPAA. I don't d/l movies, but I rent them and burn them. I'm still paying for them, and I feel that if I pay for it, I should damn well be able to watch it whenever I want. Netflix has to pay for the movies they rent out, and I pay Netflix.
The problem I have with going to the movies (which I still do on a regular basis) is that the ticket prices have become OBSCENELY expensive. $7 or $8 per ticket for an adult, and then the goddamn popcorn is literally almost as much. There is no reason on earth for popcorn to cost six fucking dollars, nor a soda four dollars. None.
Until the cost of going to the movies comes down (same for the price of CDs), then fuck the MPAA. They makes hojillions of dollars, and box office sales were down almost this far in 1985, and they certainly couldn't blame that on the internet.
Pirated applications and games are a different story. They're too expensive also, imo, but there's really no way to justify pirating them.

If P2P goes away, I won't lose any sleep. There are relatively cheap student versions of just about everything out there, and I have a job.




Top
                 

Etile
Etile
Joined: 19 Nov 2003
Posts: 34899
PostPosted: 06-28-2005 06:31 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


Pauly wrote:
The thing is, what you have to understand is that something drastic needs to be done. While everyone here may like to download stuff and your own personal downloads probably have no impact whatsoever on the market, multiply that by at least 5 million and you can see the impact it starts to have.

Cinema takings are well down this year. The music industry is saying that profits are at an all time low. Game companies are going bankrupt because of poor sales.

Now you may have no sympathy for these people, because they are ultimately richer than you, but it was only a matter of time before something big came into play to try and stop the sheer amount of piracy that is taking place now. It's out of control. Literally everyone I know has bought pirate DVD's over the past year. This was only to be expected when broadband was introduced and couple that with CD Writers and now DVD writers, it was completely fucking obvious where this was all heading, and part of me thinks "well, fucking blame Sony for making CD Writers. What the hell did you think people were going to use a PC with broadband internet and a CD writer for????"


ok, piracy of just-released movies comes from crappy handheld camcorders in cinemas (a failure of cinema security) or from leaks in the distribution network. Without these P2P has nothing.

But largely it's because - as a poll in the UK recently suggested - most people don't see it as theft, and it isn't difficult to see why. If I steal your TV set, I have your TV and you don't. However if I copy one of your DVDs, you still have your movie, and now I have it too. That just doesn't seem like theft to many people.

And when you factor in the long tradition of videoing stuff off the TV and cassette copying...

However I don't buy those 'lost earnings' figures they quote for two simple reasons:

- they're guesstimates and nothing more. there's no way they can get an accurate figure
- they assume that everyone who ever pirated a movie or software would have bought it if they hadn't pirated it. This just isn't a tenable assumption, especially where expensive software like Photoshop and the like is concerned. Even with cheaper stuff like movies and games there's no guarantee that someone would have bought it if they hadn't copied it.




Top
                 

Etile
Etile
Joined: 19 Nov 2003
Posts: 34899
PostPosted: 06-28-2005 06:33 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


Nightshade wrote:
$7 or $8 per ticket


lol, it's nearly that much in £££ in parts of the UK. Not just London either.




Top
                 

Karot!
Karot!
Joined: 31 Jul 2001
Posts: 19348
PostPosted: 06-28-2005 06:35 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


A movie ticket is expensive here too... like 15 euro's i think? New CD's are at least 20 euros, usually a few euro's more. I think we have somewhat cheaper popcorn in the theaters though.




Top
                 

Messatsu Ko Jy-ouu
Messatsu Ko Jy-ouu
Joined: 24 Nov 2000
Posts: 44139
PostPosted: 06-28-2005 06:36 AM           Profile   Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


Ryoki wrote:
I think we have somewhat cheaper popcorn in the theaters though.


think again

you're also forced to get a 12 gallon bucket of coke, which noone ever finishes

not to mention the lack of legroom in cinema's
urk :(



_________________
Image


Top
                 

eepberries
eepberries
Joined: 24 Jan 2005
Posts: 1848
PostPosted: 06-28-2005 06:37 AM           Profile   Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


Yeah. It's shocking. I spent 18$ yesterday just to see a movie. That included:

1 ticket
1 medium coke
1 order of nachos

:icon27:




Top
                 

Messatsu Ko Jy-ouu
Messatsu Ko Jy-ouu
Joined: 24 Nov 2000
Posts: 44139
PostPosted: 06-28-2005 06:37 AM           Profile   Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


seremtan wrote:
Pauly wrote:
The thing is, what you have to understand is that something drastic needs to be done. While everyone here may like to download stuff and your own personal downloads probably have no impact whatsoever on the market, multiply that by at least 5 million and you can see the impact it starts to have.

Cinema takings are well down this year. The music industry is saying that profits are at an all time low. Game companies are going bankrupt because of poor sales.

Now you may have no sympathy for these people, because they are ultimately richer than you, but it was only a matter of time before something big came into play to try and stop the sheer amount of piracy that is taking place now. It's out of control. Literally everyone I know has bought pirate DVD's over the past year. This was only to be expected when broadband was introduced and couple that with CD Writers and now DVD writers, it was completely fucking obvious where this was all heading, and part of me thinks "well, fucking blame Sony for making CD Writers. What the hell did you think people were going to use a PC with broadband internet and a CD writer for????"


ok, piracy of just-released movies comes from crappy handheld camcorders in cinemas (a failure of cinema security) or from leaks in the distribution network. Without these P2P has nothing.

But largely it's because - as a poll in the UK recently suggested - most people don't see it as theft, and it isn't difficult to see why. If I steal your TV set, I have your TV and you don't. However if I copy one of your DVDs, you still have your movie, and now I have it too. That just doesn't seem like theft to many people.

And when you factor in the long tradition of videoing stuff off the TV and cassette copying...

However I don't buy those 'lost earnings' figures they quote for two simple reasons:

- they're guesstimates and nothing more. there's no way they can get an accurate figure
- they assume that everyone who ever pirated a movie or software would have bought it if they hadn't pirated it. This just isn't a tenable assumption, especially where expensive software like Photoshop and the like is concerned. Even with cheaper stuff like movies and games there's no guarantee that someone would have bought it if they hadn't copied it.


they really shouldnt "market" is as stealing. they should make a "forge your own cash" analogy, IMO. that would be more effective i think



_________________
Image


Top
                 

eepberries
eepberries
Joined: 24 Jan 2005
Posts: 1848
PostPosted: 06-28-2005 06:38 AM           Profile   Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


MKJ wrote:
Ryoki wrote:
I think we have somewhat cheaper popcorn in the theaters though.


think again

you're also forced to get a 12 gallon bucket of coke, which noone ever finishes

not to mention the lack of legroom in cinema's
urk :(

I actually probably would finish it (I'm usually not hungry, just thirsty) but I always try not to since I'd end up having to go to the bathroom in the middle of the movie as well as the fact that it just isn't great for you.




Top
                 

plained
plained
Joined: 12 Jun 2002
Posts: 18772
PostPosted: 06-28-2005 06:48 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


the last movie i went to it took awile to find a non-gooed up headrest the seats were sick.

and yea im not very long and i was cramed up like a mofo.

it wasnt a old theatre iether




Top
                 

Who's that man, Mommy?
Who's that man, Mommy?
Joined: 27 Aug 2003
Posts: 5316
PostPosted: 06-28-2005 06:50 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


i'm totally pro-piracy.

for the first time, mankind can share and reproduce something, in this case information, at nearly no cost. this is as much of a technical revolution as electricity was.

the producing people just need to realize this. currently, they're panicly trying to sustain the satus quo. they will fail sooner or later.

and... you don't need quadrillions of dollar to make good movies.




Top
                 

social engineer
social engineer
Joined: 13 Oct 2001
Posts: 30226
PostPosted: 06-28-2005 07:02 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


Nightshade wrote:
I have no sympathy for the MPAA. I don't d/l movies, but I rent them and burn them. I'm still paying for them, and I feel that if I pay for it, I should damn well be able to watch it whenever I want. Netflix has to pay for the movies they rent out, and I pay Netflix.
The problem I have with going to the movies (which I still do on a regular basis) is that the ticket prices have become OBSCENELY expensive. $7 or $8 per ticket for an adult, and then the goddamn popcorn is literally almost as much. There is no reason on earth for popcorn to cost six fucking dollars, nor a soda four dollars. None.
Until the cost of going to the movies comes down (same for the price of CDs), then fuck the MPAA. They makes hojillions of dollars, and box office sales were down almost this far in 1985, and they certainly couldn't blame that on the internet.
Pirated applications and games are a different story. They're too expensive also, imo, but there's really no way to justify pirating them.

If P2P goes away, I won't lose any sleep. There are relatively cheap student versions of just about everything out there, and I have a job.


Netflix wasn't (isnt?) doing so well after Blockbuster started renting online, and has had to partner with Wal-Mart to try and help themselves get ahead of the game. Just because you pay Netflix (or Blockbuster) doesn't give you the right to burn movies that you don't own. I'm not seeing how you can circumvent that, knowing you're only paying a few dollars per DVD.

On to the price of movies at the theaters:

how is it the MPAA's fault that a bag of popcorn is $4? or a cup of Coke is $5? do they regulate those prices? that's a serious question.

$7 or $8 dollars for just the movie per adult is not a big deal. i can watch the top flicks on a DLP projector for the same price at my local Harkins theater. you pay for the experience (especially if you don't have an HT setup at home).




Top
                 

social engineer
social engineer
Joined: 13 Oct 2001
Posts: 30226
PostPosted: 06-28-2005 07:17 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


Pauly wrote:
The thing is, what you have to understand is that something drastic needs to be done. While everyone here may like to download stuff and your own personal downloads probably have no impact whatsoever on the market, multiply that by at least 5 million and you can see the impact it starts to have.

Cinema takings are well down this year. The music industry is saying that profits are at an all time low. Game companies are going bankrupt because of poor sales.

Now you may have no sympathy for these people, because they are ultimately richer than you, but it was only a matter of time before something big came into play to try and stop the sheer amount of piracy that is taking place now. It's out of control. Literally everyone I know has bought pirate DVD's over the past year. This was only to be expected when broadband was introduced and couple that with CD Writers and now DVD writers, it was completely fucking obvious where this was all heading, and part of me thinks "well, fucking blame Sony for making CD Writers. What the hell did you think people were going to use a PC with broadband internet and a CD writer for????"


i agree with almost all of your post, but am not sure about your stance on the movie industry's earnings. are you saying that they're down ONLY because of piracy? because, since the advent of the DVD, they've been steadily declining. DVD's and affordable Home Theaters have made it possible for your average consumer to have a decent setup at home. during this timeline of the dvd evolution is where realized i could put together something that was almost as good as a cinema for a few years worth of movie going money, in the comfort of my own home. i rarely go to the cinema anymore, unless i cannot wait for the DVD - The Lord Of The Rings series is a good example - AND i bought the extended versions when they were released. but i regress..

again, i don't think JUST piracy is to blame for the dying age of cinema-going, and for cinemas to get back on track they need to definitely lower their prices across the board.

i agree with you though that this is a huge ruling and it was just a matter of time before something like this happened. it's good because of the amount of piracy everywhere, but it's bad for the open source community and other free tradings (live music, etc). I'll not give up my BT so easily.




Top
                 

social engineer
social engineer
Joined: 13 Oct 2001
Posts: 30226
PostPosted: 06-28-2005 07:20 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


Pext wrote:
i'm totally pro-piracy.

for the first time, mankind can share and reproduce something, in this case information, at nearly no cost. this is as much of a technical revolution as electricity was.

the producing people just need to realize this. currently, they're panicly trying to sustain the satus quo. they will fail sooner or later.

and... you don't need quadrillions of dollar to make good movies.


maybe if you were an artist of any sort, and it affected your bottom line, you'd be thinking different.

you seem to have this 'net rebel mentality - i think you'll look back on your post in a few years and say, "man, did i type that?"




Top
                 

Insane Quaker
Insane Quaker
Joined: 10 May 2005
Posts: 292
PostPosted: 06-28-2005 07:35 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


Ryoki wrote:
A movie ticket is expensive here too... like 15 euro's i think?
yes, but: AH Filmweken!!!!!111111




Top
                 

Who's that man, Mommy?
Who's that man, Mommy?
Joined: 27 Aug 2003
Posts: 5316
PostPosted: 06-28-2005 07:40 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


hm... i'll do some reading on the subject.




Top
                 

Elite
Elite
Joined: 06 May 2002
Posts: 10443
PostPosted: 06-28-2005 07:43 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


this just in...supreme court rules i own all of fucking fagot pansies...



_________________
a defining attribute of a government is that it has a monopoly on the legitimate exercise of violence...


Top
                 

social engineer
social engineer
Joined: 13 Oct 2001
Posts: 30226
PostPosted: 06-28-2005 07:44 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


in case someone hasn't seen an english version of this article




Top
                 

Insane Quaker
Insane Quaker
Joined: 21 May 2005
Posts: 396
PostPosted: 06-28-2005 07:51 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


The decision seems to say that if people who make something don't modify their invention to prevent infringement they can be held liable for whatever it is people are doing with it.

Don't these kind of things set a precedent? If so, the implications are kindof nutty.

Oh well, there is a world outside America, a world I happen to reside in and one which will continue to make software with potentially illegal uses.

As for p2p piracy, plenty of artists broadly support it.
I download most of my music with a browser thse days though, though logically that should be covered by this ruling too.

As for the movies, I just go to a shop first and smuggle in cheap food and drink.




Top
                 

Who's that man, Mommy?
Who's that man, Mommy?
Joined: 27 Aug 2003
Posts: 5316
PostPosted: 06-28-2005 08:01 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


iambowelfish wrote:
Oh well, there is a world outside America, a world I happen to reside in and one which will continue to make software with potentially illegal uses.


Sweden :)
just take a look at thepiratebay and their response letters to legal threats.




Top
                 

Approaching the singularity
Approaching the singularity
Joined: 28 Jan 2002
Posts: 13399
PostPosted: 06-28-2005 08:07 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


the pirate bay is great, I get all my stuff from there




Top
                 

The voices in your head
The voices in your head
Joined: 14 Dec 2002
Posts: 10054
PostPosted: 06-28-2005 09:06 AM           Profile   Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


Pauly wrote:

...Cinema takings are well down this year. The music industry is saying that profits are at an all time low. Game companies are going bankrupt because of poor sales...



Well I think many people (myself included) get pissed off with going out, paying a bunch of cash to see a flick then sitting through a half an hour of commercials before the show starts. Downloading is starting to become more of a "fuck you" to the RIAA and MPAA since their endless lawsuits started. Fairly priced media, limited theatre commercials, and a good selection MP3 subscription services which are fairly priced and aren't DRM'ed out the arse. All of those things will actually help stop piracy. The lawsuits are simply fueling more IMO.




Top
                 

The Afflicted
The Afflicted
Joined: 16 Feb 2005
Posts: 557
PostPosted: 06-28-2005 10:02 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


Ryoki wrote:
Seems to me like blaming the creators of a browser for the fact that illegal sites can be reached. Or is that a bad comparison?


Its only a good comparison if the browser creators are well aware that 95% of the sites that can be reached via their browser are illegal, and 95% of people who use their browser are browsing illegal sites.

If p2p were about the free exchange of legal software/music/movies, etc, and a few bad seeds happen to abuse it, then your analogy would hold water.



_________________
http://www.planetquake.com/stormshadow


Top
                 
Quake3World.com | Forum Index | General Discussion


Post new topic Reply to topic


cron
Quake3World.com
© ZeniMax. Zenimax, QUAKE III ARENA, Id Software and associated trademarks are trademarks of the ZeniMax group of companies. All rights reserved.
This is an unofficial fan website without any affiliation with or endorsement by ZeniMax.
All views and opinions expressed are those of the author.