That should explain that I am NOT saying that they're all innocent, but Shaft and Puff ARE saying they were all guilty, which is the rhetoric.

I agree with that analysis. My only interjection, is how she maybe initially receives the benefit of the doubt, but he does not. If that did not happen, maybe nobody would have lost their life. We'd need the article and possibly more to duke anything out - and I'm sure that if either are demonstrably found guilty, there would be no disagreement over a conviction.

When I say 'feminists' - I am obviously referring to the feminists in particular who have said whatever stupid shit is in question. We can argue semantics all day, but it's not really much fun, tbh.

I shall certainly agree, that not all feminists in society are radical extremists.

Aye. There should simply be none, on either side, until the justice system has done it's duty. Either way, that absolutely has to be allowed to happen first.
Afterwards, should it be a shit-show - that's a come what may basis. Christ knows what the 'right' thing may be in any such instance, bar thorough third-party investigation. Thanks for the read suggestion, I'd not heard of it, so will have a gander.

i think you are a fabulously entertaining and talented writer!

let me know when you write some books so i can buy them!

i'm serios ey

We all know you're somewhat wordally challenged dear plainerd. Just chuck us mommy's note and you can be excused

You're too dumb to even know what anyone was talking about.

So she drank a lot and you thought that meant yes, tell us more.

You know who likes to downplay rape statistics? Convicted rapists.

I was raised to treat women and men alike with respect. I'll hold the door open for anyone and I respect people's right for personal space.

And just for shits and giggles:

Do I believe women deserve equal treatment and respect same as men? Yes.

Do I believe women should be given special rights and an advantage over men? No.

Do I believe efforts should be made to increase women's interest or participation in industries and professions typically dominated by men? Yes.


Now I'm gonna go cook an awesome meal for my girlfriend because feminism made me feel guilty about liking tits.

I honestly couldn't say. Many feminists no longer wish to identify as one, so it'd be a very, very tricky guestimate to make.
If we could get any information, it would be interesting.

On campus feminists, on gender studies courses though? Probaby all of them. Bar the few that speak out about a culture of brainwashing that is far more about activism, than it is about research.

Nice attempt to instigate there, Ursula. Put the ladle away. Up your arse, preferably.

:drool:


oh and l see lies there, i am almost 100% sure u make the meal jus because, because you are awesome!

They've managed to get our opposition party to adopt a 50/50 man/women split. That's a pretty big influence imo.

If they were far right nazis, would you care then?

it's a valid example of the opposite side. regressives are the farthest of the far left. nazis are considered the far, far right.
noone's calling anyone a nazi. answer the question.

Go ahead. I wish you good fortune in finding proof. Else, whatever kiddo. You're entitled to your opinion. Even if it's based on shallow, fetid bitterness.

edit: it's not even what the ideology is. it's that it's an ideology at all. noone should be going into further education to be radicalised.

This isn't black and white thinking

Skimmed through this hot mess but I would like to say that I don't like feminism, socialism, entitlements or anything else that tries to "level the playing field".

Life is not supposed to be fair. There's this sick idea in the later generations' minds that every fucking thing needs to be equal for everyone. The very idea of equality goes completely against the progress of mankind. Technological milestones will not be reached, medicine will not get better, it will be a dead society. There will be no incentives to succeed. Where do you draw the line with equality? Do we all have to have the same job, same income, same uniform, same amount of food, on and on.....?

Life is meant to be competitive. Everything is, on all scales of existence. From the tiny imperfections of the early universe that led to the accretion of matter into stars, to the natural selection process of evolution. If the early universe were perfect and equal, nothing would exist. If all life forms were equal, there would be no evolution and we'd all be single-cell organisms.

This isn't black and white thinking—as though I'm suggesting proponents of equality are supportive of that extreme end—they just don't realize it's a fundamental fact of the universe. The more you try to equalize a system, the less it will evolve and become more complex.

Sharon – “Ever since you joined this PC thing you just bully people and wait for people to say anything improper so that you can jump down their throats for whatever words he or she used.”
Randy – “He or she is an A-gender phobic micro-aggression, Sharon. You are a bigot.”

You haven't proven you're not a bigot. Looks like I win this round.