Things that need to be done...

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
SplishSplash
Posts: 4467
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2000 8:00 am

Post by SplishSplash »

Someone try clicking the "WoW questions" thread.

It seems there are two "General Discussion" links at the top right. It's not a problem, just thought it might interest Turbie or whoever's hacking away at these boards.

Edit: Gone now, nevermind.
User avatar
MKJ
Posts: 32582
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2000 8:00 am

Post by MKJ »

stop being on crack
[url=http://profile.mygamercard.net/Emka+Jee][img]http://card.mygamercard.net/sig/Emka+Jee.jpg[/img][/url]
SplishSplash
Posts: 4467
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2000 8:00 am

Post by SplishSplash »

I can hear the forums in my dreams.
User avatar
Transient
Posts: 11357
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2001 8:00 am

Post by Transient »

"If you build it, they will come."
Fender
Posts: 5876
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2001 8:00 am

Post by Fender »

The Yahoo icon does not have a transparent background.
Image
R00k
Posts: 15188
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2000 8:00 am

Post by R00k »

Look 7 posts up. :p
Turbanator
Posts: 883
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 1983 7:00 am

Post by Turbanator »

if someone can be bothered, the msn, icq, aim and Y! icons all need remaking.

<img src="http://web.icq.com/whitepages/online?icq=16398296&img=5"><img src="http://www.quake3world.com/ubb/icq_text.gif">
saturn
Posts: 4334
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2000 8:00 am
Location: The Netherlands

Post by saturn »

I just noticed that the lettertype of topics is in bold, it looks a bit cluttered IMO. What if this is changed? :)
glossy
Posts: 2285
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2002 7:00 am

Post by glossy »

Turbanator wrote:if someone can be bothered, the msn, icq, aim and Y! icons all need remaking.

<img src="http://web.icq.com/whitepages/online?icq=16398296&img=5"><img src="http://www.quake3world.com/ubb/icq_text.gif">
remade how? do they need transparent background only, or do you actually want something remade ?
Turbanator
Posts: 883
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 1983 7:00 am

Post by Turbanator »

saturn wrote:I just noticed that the lettertype of topics is in bold, it looks a bit cluttered IMO. What if this is changed? :)
I was thinking about this last night, should we put the topic titles back to unbold (as in ubb q3w)... and what about underlines... underlines look cluttered imho....
Turbanator
Posts: 883
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 1983 7:00 am

Post by Turbanator »

glossy wrote:
Turbanator wrote:if someone can be bothered, the msn, icq, aim and Y! icons all need remaking.

<img src="http://web.icq.com/whitepages/online?icq=16398296&img=5"><img src="http://www.quake3world.com/ubb/icq_text.gif">
remade how? do they need transparent background only, or do you actually want something remade ?
they need the text next to them, and some of them need to be smaller so it all blends together.
U4EA
Posts: 2894
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2000 8:00 am

Post by U4EA »

Why does q3w insist on using only 90% of the page width?
Turbanator
Posts: 883
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 1983 7:00 am

Post by Turbanator »

U4EA wrote:Why does q3w insist on using only 90% of the page width?
because we can?
glossy
Posts: 2285
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2002 7:00 am

Post by glossy »

q3w is a rebel without a cause

rock on!
U4EA
Posts: 2894
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2000 8:00 am

Post by U4EA »

Wasted space innit? We could be using 96% or 98% instead and still have a decent amount of padding.
saturn
Posts: 4334
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2000 8:00 am
Location: The Netherlands

Post by saturn »

Turbanator wrote:
saturn wrote:I just noticed that the lettertype of topics is in bold, it looks a bit cluttered IMO. What if this is changed? :)
I was thinking about this last night, should we put the topic titles back to unbold (as in ubb q3w)... and what about underlines... underlines look cluttered imho....
no bold and underlines :)
Underpants?
Posts: 4755
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2001 7:00 am

Post by Underpants? »

U4EA wrote:Wasted space innit? We could be using 96% or 98% instead and still have a decent amount of padding.
omfg!lol!rofl!lmao! UR right, U4EALOLRFLOLMAO! that extra 6% is going to waste!!! Fuck me, there are starving children in Mexico (ie. bliusca) who have NO forum whatsoever and like ravenous internet gluttons we're simply tossing unused forum away! your post is neither petty nor does it in any way make you out to be a whining trifling nerd!! :upupupupupupupupupupupupup:
U4EA
Posts: 2894
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2000 8:00 am

Post by U4EA »

kekeke ?
Turbanator
Posts: 883
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 1983 7:00 am

Post by Turbanator »

[lvlshot]http://www.quake3world.com/turb/forum/1.jpg[/lvlshot]
[lvlshot]http://www.quake3world.com/turb/forum/2.jpg[/lvlshot]
Fender
Posts: 5876
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2001 8:00 am

Post by Fender »

I like the font in #2, but no underline.
Ryoki
Posts: 13460
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2001 7:00 am

Post by Ryoki »

Please, for the love of moses sandals, turn on the HTML in posts. :tear:
[size=85][color=#0080BF]io chiamo pinguini![/color][/size]
SplishSplash
Posts: 4467
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2000 8:00 am

Post by SplishSplash »

Underlined looks good.
Bdw3
Posts: 3348
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Bdw3 »

Fender wrote:I like the font in #2, but no underline.
Same. :icon14:
User avatar
MKJ
Posts: 32582
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2000 8:00 am

Post by MKJ »

center is a depricated tag :E

but yea :p
[url=http://profile.mygamercard.net/Emka+Jee][img]http://card.mygamercard.net/sig/Emka+Jee.jpg[/img][/url]
glossy
Posts: 2285
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2002 7:00 am

Post by glossy »

riddla wrote:Here's the list of completely safe HTML tags I have allowed on my phpbb boards:

b,i,u,p,pre,blockquote,br,strong,ul,ol,li,H1,H2,H3,H4,tt
"completely safe" is a bit of a overconfidant place to be.

by the way, i would heavily suggest rewriting the "allowed html" checking code, it's shitty with stock ubb (for example, you can't do <tag attribute="value">, it'll be blocked/disallowed -- only straight <tag> works. this means no <bgsound src="">/<iframe src="">/<img src=""> stuff if you wanted it)
Post Reply