lol@ russian cold war tech

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
Tsakali
Posts: 7175
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2000 8:00 am

lol@ russian cold war tech

Post by Tsakali »

http://englishrussia.com/index.php/2010 ... kranoplan/

Image
1987 was the year when the first 350 tons ground effect “ship” from the series of Soviet battle missile carriers was produced. It was called Lun after the Russian name for a bird of prey - hen harrier. Another name for this vehicle was Project 903. It carried 6 Moskit cruise missiles (SS-N-22 Sunburn in NATO classification). Hitting four of them causes inevitable sinking of a vessel of any know type and size.
scared?
Posts: 20988
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 1:28 pm

Re: lol@ russian cold war tech

Post by scared? »

old....
AmIdYfReAk
Posts: 6926
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2000 8:00 am

Re: lol@ russian cold war tech

Post by AmIdYfReAk »

is it normal that i would like to drive that thing?
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Re: lol@ russian cold war tech

Post by Doombrain »

the russians didn't fuck about.
User avatar
seremtan
Posts: 36023
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 8:00 am

Re: lol@ russian cold war tech

Post by seremtan »

in soviet russia, thunderbirds aren't go
Ryoki
Posts: 13460
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2001 7:00 am

Re: lol@ russian cold war tech

Post by Ryoki »

Leave it to the Ruskis to build a shipkiller that's not seaworthy :up:

Kinda like the hoovercraft come to think of it... cool design and cool tech, but ultimately quite useless as a military machine.
[size=85][color=#0080BF]io chiamo pinguini![/color][/size]
User avatar
seremtan
Posts: 36023
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 8:00 am

Re: lol@ russian cold war tech

Post by seremtan »

hoovercrafts were combat effective against dust bunnies
+JuggerNaut+
Posts: 22175
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am

Re: lol@ russian cold war tech

Post by +JuggerNaut+ »

:olo:
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Re: lol@ russian cold war tech

Post by Doombrain »

Ryoki wrote:Leave it to the Ruskis to build a shipkiller that's not seaworthy :up:

Kinda like the hoovercraft come to think of it... cool design and cool tech, but ultimately quite useless as a military machine.
MURRRRR
Ryoki
Posts: 13460
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2001 7:00 am

Re: lol@ russian cold war tech

Post by Ryoki »

seremtan wrote:hoovercrafts were combat effective against dust bunnies
lol, damnit :p

Also, what are you murring about doombrain? Any particular part of that you don't agree with or do you just want some attention..?
[size=85][color=#0080BF]io chiamo pinguini![/color][/size]
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Re: lol@ russian cold war tech

Post by Doombrain »

just seeing if you're still upset with me.
Ryoki
Posts: 13460
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2001 7:00 am

Re: lol@ russian cold war tech

Post by Ryoki »

always my friend
[size=85][color=#0080BF]io chiamo pinguini![/color][/size]
Nightshade
Posts: 17020
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Re: lol@ russian cold war tech

Post by Nightshade »

Ryoki wrote:Leave it to the Ruskis to build a shipkiller that's not seaworthy :up:

Kinda like the hoovercraft come to think of it... cool design and cool tech, but ultimately quite useless as a military machine.
Actually, wing-in-ground effect craft are very effective, but they don't do too well on rougher seas. Plus, one rogue wave and it's fucked if the pilot's not paying attention.
User avatar
Transient
Posts: 11357
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2001 8:00 am

Re: lol@ russian cold war tech

Post by Transient »

So if you're behind the wheel of one of those things, are you simultaneously a pilot and a captain? Or does your title change once the thing becomes airborne or lands? :confused:
[quote="YourGrandpa"]I'm satisfied with voicing my opinion and moving on.[/quote]
User avatar
Eraser
Posts: 19183
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Re: lol@ russian cold war tech

Post by Eraser »

Pretty cool.
Saw a link to this on that same site:

http://www.dalimunthe.com/2010/02/rp-fl ... ip-in.html

It's a ship that floats horizontally but can flip to stand in a stable upright position.

Image
User avatar
Eraser
Posts: 19183
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Re: lol@ russian cold war tech

Post by Eraser »

Heh, and this could come straight out of a James Bond movie. A russian underground submarine base:

http://englishrussia.com/index.php/2008 ... rine-base/
Ryoki
Posts: 13460
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2001 7:00 am

Re: lol@ russian cold war tech

Post by Ryoki »

Nightshade wrote:Actually, wing-in-ground effect craft are very effective, but they don't do too well on rougher seas. Plus, one rogue wave and it's fucked if the pilot's not paying attention.
Does flying so low mean you're under the radar..?

That underground submarine base is awesome cool :D
[size=85][color=#0080BF]io chiamo pinguini![/color][/size]
Hannibal
Posts: 1853
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2000 8:00 am

Re: lol@ russian cold war tech

Post by Hannibal »

lol. Play Harpoon II enough and them damn Sunburns will wreck your shit on a regular basis.

Image
Plan B
Posts: 3599
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2001 8:00 am

Re: lol@ russian cold war tech

Post by Plan B »

Gotta love this shit.
I like how the Russian tech seems awkward and clunky, but effective and menacing at the same time.

[socialist hippie]
Such a shame all this time, energy, intellectual resource and money went/goes into these ridiculous projects, where the money could so much better be spent raising the general standard of living.
[/socialist hippie]
Nightshade
Posts: 17020
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Re: lol@ russian cold war tech

Post by Nightshade »

Ryoki wrote:
Does flying so low mean you're under the radar..?
Absolutely, you're lost in the backscatter from the ocean's surface. Low-rent stealth technology. :ninja:
Scarface
Posts: 1775
Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2000 8:00 am

Re: lol@ russian cold war tech

Post by Scarface »

it looks similar to the antinov 225

Image
Tsakali
Posts: 7175
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2000 8:00 am

Re: lol@ russian cold war tech

Post by Tsakali »

Nightshade wrote:
Ryoki wrote:
Does flying so low mean you're under the radar..?
Absolutely, you're lost in the backscatter from the ocean's surface. Low-rent stealth technology. :ninja:
depends... radar equipped vessels will detect it, so if it's going after ships what's the point?
Hannibal
Posts: 1853
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2000 8:00 am

Re: lol@ russian cold war tech

Post by Hannibal »

Tsakali wrote: depends... radar equipped vessels will detect it, so if it's going after ships what's the point?
Well it's not dropping torpedoes so that flying turd doesn't have to get very close. It just needs to be a stable delivery platform. The sunburn's range is 120km and it skims the wavetops at mach 2.5ish before popping up at the last second to deliver the payload.
Don Carlos
Posts: 17515
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Re: lol@ russian cold war tech

Post by Don Carlos »

Eraser wrote:Heh, and this could come straight out of a James Bond movie. A russian underground submarine base:

http://englishrussia.com/index.php/2008 ... rine-base/
Amazing game level right there!
Where were you when the West was defeated?
[url=http://profile.mygamercard.net/doncarlos83][img]http://card.mygamercard.net/gbar/doncarlos83.gif[/img][/url]
Nightshade
Posts: 17020
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Re: lol@ russian cold war tech

Post by Nightshade »

Tsakali wrote: depends... radar equipped vessels will detect it, so if it's going after ships what's the point?
I doubt anything less than an Aegis class cruiser-type vessel would see it.
Post Reply